Sameer Verma wrote:
dotProject (http://www.dotproject.net/) and Project.net
(http://www.project.net/) are good candidates. They are both FOSS,
although I haven't had much luck locating Project.net's FOSS license.
Their Bus. Dev. guy tells me that the next release will be GPLv3.
dotProject is
There is also alfresco, which seems quite suited to larger projects:
www.alfresco.com and is GPL.
Kind Regards,
David Van Assche
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sameer Verma wrote:
dotProject (http://www.dotproject.net/) and Project.net
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sameer Verma wrote:
dotProject (http://www.dotproject.net/) and Project.net
(http://www.project.net/) are good candidates. They are both FOSS,
although I haven't had much luck locating Project.net's FOSS license.
In my opinion we should use a customized trac for project management, i
don't like to have too many resources to take into
count, we already have the necessary ones (Trac, mediawiki..moodle)
The Gantt plugin it's a good solution there.
Rafael Ortiz
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Sameer
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion we should use a customized trac for project management, i
don't like to have too many resources to take into
count, we already have the necessary ones (Trac, mediawiki..moodle)
+1
Sameer
I think that we are going to find that by the fall 2009 we will see a
release team spontaneously form and take a lead role in the project.
For the first release, Fall 2008, our effort was centered around the
organization of Sugar Labs.
For the second release, Spring 2009, organizational we are
Hi,
was wondering if there would be some value of including the notion of
projects inside SugarLabs' organizational structure.
Teams seem to me as something not bounded in time, a way to focus energy.
Projects would be smaller in scope, involve several teams and
milestones would be an important
I think the idea of a roadmap (with project schedules) within each
team would address much of this need.
-walter
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
was wondering if there would be some value of including the notion of
projects inside SugarLabs'
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Walter Bender wrote:
I think the idea of a roadmap (with project schedules) within each
team would address much of this need.
Agreed.
Project management is a pain in the ass, and we don't always have the
resources to have dedicated and proper project management -- which
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
was wondering if there would be some value of including the notion of
projects inside SugarLabs' organizational structure.
Teams seem to me as something not bounded in time, a way to focus energy.
Projects would be smaller in scope, involve several teams and
milestones
In our case, it's harder, but might still make sense. If we go
this route, let's make sure we support projects involving multiple
teams. For example, Sugar on a Stick would touch Development,
Infrastructure, Marketing...
I am going to be setting up LiquidPlanner, a free for nonprofits,
11 matches
Mail list logo
