Yes, a PackageKit backend that handles .xo files could be written. I
believe I've suggested this before.
--Scott
On Tuesday, September 22, 2009, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 00:54, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Se
El Mon, 21-09-2009 a las 16:33 -0400, Bill Bogstad escribió:
> The lack of good dependency reporting and version tracking for
> Activities makes this difficult. Something like XO bundles could
> work better for for some scenarios though.
If it were on me, I'd just ditch the XO bundle format and
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> [cc += mstone]
> [cc -= everyone else]
>
> El Mon, 21-09-2009 a las 12:54 -0400, Bill Bogstad escribió:
>> I agree with your statement about security updates being what is
>> desired here However, you can have bugs elsewhere
>> in the st
[cc += mstone]
[cc -= everyone else]
El Mon, 21-09-2009 a las 12:54 -0400, Bill Bogstad escribió:
> I agree with your statement about security updates being what is
> desired here However, you can have bugs elsewhere
> in the stack which can cause problems even if all anyone ever runs
> directly
