Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] minor issue with T41: blue tooth LED is on even if bluetooth support is not compiled into kernel

2008-12-03 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:25:38 +0100 Toralf Förster wrote: > I observed this with kernel 2.6.26.8 (Gentoo) prior kernel versions instead > doesn't seem to switch on that LED. You dont need to have BT support in the kernel to have the BT device "on". Is your kernel built with rfkill support, if so,

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] thinkpad-acpi release 0.21-20080612 uploaded to ibm-acpi.sf.net

2008-06-13 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:24:56 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > I have released version 0.21-20080612 of thinkpad-acpi through the Running 2.6.26-rc6 on a X31, I get Bluetooth autoenabled during boot. That does not happen with 2.6.26-rc5 (and the included tpacpi). I did not yet have the t

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] thinkpad-acpi not working on -rc series

2008-03-17 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:43:59 +0100 Evgeni Golov wrote: > There was a breakage in drivers/acpi/ec.c, which Henrique solved on his > own until a patch was in Linus' tree. With -rc6 you should be able to > remove the drivers/acpi/ec.c part from the thinkpad-acpi patch for -rc4 &g

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] thinkpad-acpi not working on -rc series

2008-03-17 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:54:47 +0100 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > I just wanted to know if there was a reason a patch was still needed > against 2.6.25-rc kernels. On ibm-acpi.sf.net there's a patch against > -rc4 (wich applies cleanly against -rc5 but not against -rc6). Without > it, thinkpad-acpi do

[ibm-acpi-devel] thinkpad-acpi for 2.6.24-rc6?

2007-12-21 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hey, kernel 2.6.24-rc6 was released and I wanted to ask, if you could rebase your patch against it. TIA Evgeni Golov - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [PATCH] support NVRAM for brightness (x60 fix?)

2007-07-07 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:09:57 +0100 Alfredo Matos wrote: > Meanwhile i'm raising a red flag on the fan support in 2.6.22. It > doesn't allow writing to proc anymore. But i'll raise this on another > thread. do you have fan_control=1, when you modprobe it? ;) If not, write to the fan interface is d

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] brightness control somehow broken on my Z61m

2007-04-20 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:06:07 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:20:36 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > Make triple sure the ACPI video driver is not loaded. Does that fix > > things? > > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m > module isn't load

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] brightness control somehow broken on my Z61m

2007-04-16 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:20:36 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Make triple sure the ACPI video driver is not loaded. Does that fix > things? CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m module isn't loaded (I AM sure ;)) This "bug" applies to 2.6.19.2, 2.6.20.4 and 2.6.21-rc7 :( -- ^^^| Evgeni -Sargen

[ibm-acpi-devel] brightness control somehow broken on my Z61m

2007-04-16 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, I have a Z61m with kernel 2.6.20.4. After the boot /sys/class/backlight/ibm/actual_brightness and /proc/acpi/ibm/brightness show level 0, even if my LCD is set to the highest level. Playing around with the brightness keys on the keyboard does not change anything (but tpb shows the change corre

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] Future directions for ibm-acpi, and a rfc

2007-02-07 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:58:17 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > msi-laptop, and asus-acpi is going to be replaced with asus-laptop (a > fixed-up asus-acpi that got a new maintainer a short while ago). > > Other names I like: > thinkpad-acpi (goes well with thinkpad-ec, thinkpad-smapi

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] Future directions for ibm-acpi, and a rfc

2007-02-07 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:30:11 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > Also, with the whole Lenovo deal, I am wondering if ibm-acpi should > > not be renamed to something else with either "tp" or "thinkpad" in > > the name. Suggestions? I would prefer to rename the driver when > > the move to d

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] T60, R60, Z61 also may have the same issue

2007-01-02 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 00:58:26 +0100 Evgeni Golov wrote: > > > NACK for Z61m with latest BIOS. Fn+Home/End works, and tpb reports > > > correctly. > > > > Just checking: You are at BIOS 7FET94WW (2.12), correct? It was > > released 2006-12-18. > > Uh, 2.1

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] T60, R60, Z61 also may have the same issue

2006-12-31 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 20:34:07 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > NACK for Z61m with latest BIOS. Fn+Home/End works, and tpb reports > > correctly. > > Just checking: You are at BIOS 7FET94WW (2.12), correct? It was > released 2006-12-18. Uh, 2.12 is out? Okay, I'm on 2.11, will try 2.12

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] T60, R60, Z61 also may have the same issue

2006-12-31 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:07:45 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > It is likely that the R60 and Z61 with 2.x BIOS might have the same > issue, so if you have any of these machines with a 2.x BIOS, please > reply telling us whether it shows the brightness issue or not. NACK for Z61m with lat

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] Wanted: ACPI DSDT and dmidecode information for *60 and *61 thinkpads

2006-11-25 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:18:44 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > If you have upgraded your ThinkPad already to the *latest* BIOS, > please send *by private mail* the output of dmidecode and also of > "cat /proc/acpi/dsdt | gzip -f >dsdt.bin.gz". Please send the mails > to ibm-acpi hmh.en