Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [patch 1/2] thinkpad_acpi: signedness bugs getting current_mode

2015-03-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
d before they can then submit them to you (hopefully before you rebase again). Dave Miller seems to get on quite well in the networking tree with no rebasing at all ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au pgpXmVumfIufB.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatu

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [patch 1/2] thinkpad_acpi: signedness bugs getting current_mode

2015-03-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Darren, On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:46:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > The people you will inconvenience more by rebasing are the developers > who write patches that are based on your tree. If you rebase under > them, they may have to rebase and fix up the patches they have alre