On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Len Brown wrote:
> looks like I still have v1 in my tree -- will fix.
Thanks. V2 is a little bit different. One patch was fixed, and another
was added I think.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them
Wups,
looks like I still have v1 in my tree -- will fix.
-Len
On Saturday 26 April 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Len,
>
> This patchset has my current thinkpad-acpi queue. The target is 2.6.26's
> merge window.
>
> Some of the thinkpad-acpi patches require patches from Richard Pur
Len,
This patchset has my current thinkpad-acpi queue. The target is 2.6.26's
merge window.
Some of the thinkpad-acpi patches require patches from Richard Purdie's LED
tree that have been recently merged in mainline.
As usual, the patch set is available at:
git://repo.or.cz/linux-2.6/linux-acpi
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 17:02 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > Those patches are queued and I have no plans to change them before
> > submitting to Linus.
>
> Any news on this? Richard, could you send your queue to Linus now that
> the wind
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Those patches are queued and I have no plans to change them before
> submitting to Linus.
Any news on this? Richard, could you send your queue to Linus now that
the window is open?
If you do, I will resend my series to Len, and he will be able to jus
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 13:23 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> > If the patches that Henrique depends on are unlikely to change,
> > then I'll be happy to put them on a branch in my tree and put
> > henrique's driver on top of them. If they go upstream via your
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 13:23 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> On Thursday 10 April 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Len Brown wrote:
> > > hmmm, if we drop this series as-is into acpi-test then it will fail due
> > > to no "brightness_get"...
> >
> > Yeah. How do you wan
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Len Brown wrote:
> > hmmm, if we drop this series as-is into acpi-test then it will fail due to
> > no "brightness_get"...
>
> Yeah. How do you want to handle this? Defer the drop into acpi-test
> until Richard
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Len Brown wrote:
> hmmm, if we drop this series as-is into acpi-test then it will fail due to no
> "brightness_get"...
Yeah. How do you want to handle this? Defer the drop into acpi-test
until Richard's tree gets merged, or maybe *temporarily* merge his tree
in acpi-test al
On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> Len,
>
> This patchset has my current thinkpad-acpi queue. The target is 2.6.26's
> merge window.
>
> Some of the thinkpad-acpi patches require patches from Richard Purdie's LED
> tree that are already in -mm. As far as I know,
Len,
This patchset has my current thinkpad-acpi queue. The target is 2.6.26's
merge window.
Some of the thinkpad-acpi patches require patches from Richard Purdie's LED
tree that are already in -mm. As far as I know, those are usually merged
early when the merge window opens, so that shouldn't
11 matches
Mail list logo
