Applied.
thanks,
-Len
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 19:50, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> The initial version of the thinkpad-acpi sysfs interface (not yet released
> in any stable mainline kernel) made liberal use of named sysfs groups, in
> order to get the attributes more organized.
>
> This
The initial version of the thinkpad-acpi sysfs interface (not yet released
in any stable mainline kernel) made liberal use of named sysfs groups, in
order to get the attributes more organized.
This proved to be a really bad design decision. Maybe if attribute groups
were as flexible as a real dir
The initial version of the thinkpad-acpi sysfs interface (not yet released
in any stable mainline kernel) made liberal use of named sysfs groups, in
order to get the attributes more organized.
This proved to be a really bad design decision. Maybe if attribute groups
were as flexible as a real dir
