Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [PATCH v2] thinkpad_acpi: Support the battery wear control

On 09/12/2017, Pavel Machek wrote: > Yeah, what I'm saying is that maybe we need to extend generic power > supply driver. I don't know about that, you would have to ask the maintainers if that is appropriate. Thanks for the time! Ognjen

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [PATCH v2] thinkpad_acpi: Support the battery wear control

On Sat 2017-12-09 11:29:51, Ognjen Galić wrote: > On 09/12/2017, Pavel Machek wrote: > > In newer series (I can't find it at the moment, sorry) > > The new series is a 3-patch patchset that obsoletes this > patch. It is in the testing stage and will be pushed to > the mailing lists

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [PATCH v2] thinkpad_acpi: Support the battery wear control

On 09/12/2017, Pavel Machek wrote: > In newer series (I can't find it at the moment, sorry) The new series is a 3-patch patchset that obsoletes this patch. It is in the testing stage and will be pushed to the mailing lists and maintainers in a few days. > Maybe we should have

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [PATCH v2] thinkpad_acpi: Support the battery wear control

Hi! In newer series (I can't find it at the moment, sorry) you return "NOT_CHARGING" status when not charging because of wear control. Maybe we should have separate status "not charging due to wear control"? Thanks, Pavel

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [PATCH v2] thinkpad_acpi: Support the battery wear control

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:53:32PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Not really. > > This is generic code, so no thinkpad_acpi-specific stuff in this file, please, > even under #ifdefs. > I have some ideas, and I want your confirmation if that would be acceptable. Can I do this: Expose a new