On Wednesday 30 May 2007 20:53, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On 5/30/07, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >It is trivial to guarantee that KEY_PROG is unique for a single input
> > >device (keyboard), but it certainly
On 5/31/07, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> I am on it on the thinkpad-acpi side, so at least for that, you don't have
> to worry. I am still waiting an answer about which event is the correct one
> to output scancodes, but th
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 21:53 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Maybe we can add that requirement and driver changes (if any, for all
> > I know most drivers might already be generating such events) for
> > 2.6.23? I bet Richard would like tha
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 21:53 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Maybe we can add that requirement and driver changes (if any, for all
> I know most drivers might already be generating such events) for
> 2.6.23? I bet Richard would like that one a lot. Richard?
To be honest, I've got lost
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >It is trivial to guarantee that KEY_PROG is unique for a single input
> >device (keyboard), but it certainly won't work across multiple devices.
> >Userspace has to know what kind of
