Pedro Ribeiro wrote at 07:01:28
> > Matthew Garrett wrote at 16:11:03
> >
> >> No, the best thing to do would be to figure out what changed to require
> >> the extra 9 seconds. Are you able to work out which the last kernel
> >> release without this timeout was?
> >
> I also have a T400, and re
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:40:13AM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote:
> > I'd like to point to this after a half year of lthe last email. Shouldn't
> > it
> > be hard coded ?
>
> Windows appears to have exactly the same behaviour, so it seems that
> this
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:40:13AM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote:
> I'd like to point to this after a half year of lthe last email. Shouldn't it
> be hard coded ?
Windows appears to have exactly the same behaviour, so it seems that
this is working like designed.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.u
2010/6/9 Toralf Förster :
> Hi,
>
> Matthew Garrett wrote at 16:11:03
>> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:22:21AM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
>> > Since some kernel version (IIRC since 2.6.31) it is necessary to boot the
>> > linux kernel with that option to prevent an extra 9 seconds delay during
>> >
Am 07.06.2010 11:22 schrieb Toralf Förster:
> Since some kernel version (IIRC since 2.6.31) it is necessary to boot the
> linux kernel with that option to prevent an extra 9 seconds delay during
> reboot.
> I found this tip on the LKML -and now I'm wondering whether this option should
> be hard cod
On 11:22 Mon 07 Jun , Toralf Förster wrote:
> Since some kernel version (IIRC since 2.6.31) it is necessary to boot the
> linux kernel with that option to prevent an extra 9 seconds delay during
> reboot.
> I found this tip on the LKML -and now I'm wondering whether this option
> should
> b
Hi,
Matthew Garrett wrote at 16:11:03
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:22:21AM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
> > Since some kernel version (IIRC since 2.6.31) it is necessary to boot the
> > linux kernel with that option to prevent an extra 9 seconds delay during
> > reboot.
> > I found this tip on the
Since some kernel version (IIRC since 2.6.31) it is necessary to boot the
linux kernel with that option to prevent an extra 9 seconds delay during
reboot.
I found this tip on the LKML -and now I'm wondering whether this option should
be hard coded in the kernel sources b/c it seems to be necessa
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:22:21AM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
> Since some kernel version (IIRC since 2.6.31) it is necessary to boot the
> linux kernel with that option to prevent an extra 9 seconds delay during
> reboot.
> I found this tip on the LKML -and now I'm wondering whether this optio
