Hi Matthew!
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:45:09AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > The correct thing would be for Matthew to send it in along with the DRM
> > > stuff, which I bel
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:45:09AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > The correct thing would be for Matthew to send it in along with the DRM
> > stuff, which I believe he will do. We don't know what sort of breakage
> > could happen if we t
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:45:09AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> The correct thing would be for Matthew to send it in along with the DRM
> stuff, which I believe he will do. We don't know what sort of breakage
> could happen if we toggle that thing ON without opregion support.
The D
On ven, 2008-10-10 at 09:45 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> The correct thing would be for Matthew to send it in along with the
> DRM
> stuff, which I believe he will do. We don't know what sort of
> breakage
> could happen if we toggle that thing ON without opregion support.
>
> Anyw
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:45:09AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> The correct thing would be for Matthew to send it in along with the DRM
> stuff, which I believe he will do. We don't know what sort of breakage
> could happen if we toggle that thing ON without opregion support.
As th
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 08:49:28AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:24:20PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Parid
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 08:49:28AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:24:20PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Paride Legovini wrote:
> > > > Anyway, this becomes a minor issue
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:24:20PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Paride Legovini wrote:
> > > Anyway, this becomes a minor issue after the delay is gone. Do you plan
> > > to include Matthew Garrett's into thinkpad
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:24:20PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Paride Legovini wrote:
> > Anyway, this becomes a minor issue after the delay is gone. Do you plan
> > to include Matthew Garrett's into thinkpad-acpi? I'm still available if
> > you need to test som
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Anyway, this becomes a minor issue after the delay is gone. Do you plan
> to include Matthew Garrett's into thinkpad-acpi? I'm still available if
> you need to test something on an affected system. Just ask.
Exactly which patch from Matthew are you tal
Paride Legovini wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> On Thu, 02 Oct 2008, Paride Legovini wrote:
>>> reproduce the problem there's no delay but then I get two acpi
>>> event for every brightness change:
>> That's per BIOS design. The video event is an active event, that X.org will
>> rea
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008, Paride Legovini wrote:
> reproduce the problem there's no delay but then I get two acpi
> event for every brightness change:
That's per BIOS design. The video event is an active event, that X.org will
react to, etc.
The HKEY 5010 event is Lenovo's "hey OSD application, this
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Oct 2008, Paride Legovini wrote:
>> reproduce the problem there's no delay but then I get two acpi
>> event for every brightness change:
>
> That's per BIOS design. The video event is an active event, that X.org will
> react to, etc.
That would be
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 06:55:37AM -0400, Paride Legovini wrote:
> > Matthew Garrett once sent a patch for thinkpad-acpi to call some
> > function in the DSDT which would fix the delay.
>
> I just applied that two lines of code to the vanilla kernel and the
> delay went away. But something wrong s
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 10:11:11AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Oct 2008, Paride Legovini wrote:
> > reproduce the problem there's no delay but then I get two acpi
> > event for every brightness change:
>
> That's per BIOS design. The video event is an active event, that
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Oct 2008, Paride Legovini wrote:
>> reproduce the problem there's no delay but then I get two acpi
>> event for every brightness change:
>
> That's per BIOS design. The video event is an active event, that X.org will
> react to, etc.
That would be
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 07:29:13AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer, 2008-10-01 at 22:43 -0400, Paride Legovini wrote:
> > And thats ok. And I get the hotkeys working! At a first sight even the
> > brightness control seems to work, BUT, if (and only if) I reach the
> > lowest level of brigh
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 12:48:38AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2008, Paride Legovini wrote:
> > I'm running an X60s with a vanilla 2.6.27-rc8 kernel (but I get the
>
> Saved a copy of your e1000e EEPROM already?
Thanks for that!
> Please send me the output (gzipp
On mer, 2008-10-01 at 22:43 -0400, Paride Legovini wrote:
> And thats ok. And I get the hotkeys working! At a first sight even the
> brightness control seems to work, BUT, if (and only if) I reach the
> lowest level of brightness and I press the brightness-down key
> combination once again I get TW
On Wed, 01 Oct 2008, Paride Legovini wrote:
> I'm running an X60s with a vanilla 2.6.27-rc8 kernel (but I get the
Saved a copy of your e1000e EEPROM already?
ethtool -e eth0 >my-e1000-eeprom.txt.
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/10/2/3475814
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_b
I know that many brightness-related problems are already known, but
mine seems to still leak a good description.
I'm running an X60s with a vanilla 2.6.27-rc8 kernel (but I get the
problem also with older versions). I also think that this description
is valid also for the X60. I have no HAL runnin
21 matches
Mail list logo
