Re: Unwanted emails from IBM-MAIN

2006-09-23 Thread Robert Bardos
Listserv User Manuals are viewable/downloadable in a plenty of formats at http://www.lsoft.com/resources/manuals.asp under the heading "Listserv General User's Guide" MAIL/NOMAIL being described on page 18 of the current PDF version. Robert -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: IBM Mainfram

Re: SYS1.BRODCAST security?

2006-09-23 Thread Robert S. Hansel (RSH)
John, If you change the UACC and Global Access Table entry for SYS1.BRODCAST to READ, you will need to permit UPDATE access to SYS1.BRODCAST to whomever administers TSO Segments on RACF IDs. Regards, Bob Robert S. Hansel

Re: IODF Definitions for ICP

2006-09-23 Thread Douglas Shupe
The very best way to get comfortable with the ICP IOGEN is to read the PEER-TO-PEER document written by John Huges WSC. If you like I can send a copy, link unknown, maybe Alan can hunt it up. It is a GREAT paper. Regards, Doug Shupe - Original Message - From: "Crispin Hugo" <[EMAIL PR

Re: Unwanted emails from IBM-MAIN

2006-09-23 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 9/23/2006 2:35:58 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: under the heading "Listserv General User's Guide" MAIL/NOMAIL being described on page 18 of the current PDF version >> |The following are available from the IBM-Main List server: |Send to [EMAIL PRO

Re: Unwanted emails from IBM-MAIN

2006-09-23 Thread Eric N. Bielefeld
The easiest way to change any settings in IBM-Main is to click on the search the archives link which is added as the last line of each email by the listserve. Near the top of that screen, click on "Join or Leave the List (or change settings)". On the bottom of that page, check the first box un

Re: Job Mix (was: Speaking of SDSF)

2006-09-23 Thread Craddock, Chris
> >Perhaps it's the design of WLM that doesn't account > for profoundly diverse behaviors within a single LPAR. >Any explanation > is welcome. Whether anyone wants to recognize and admit it or not, WLM and sysplex implicitly assume you're going to share resources fairly uniformly and run everythi

Re: Job Mix (was: Speaking of SDSF)

2006-09-23 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>Whether or not you feel WLM is somehow deficient at managing such segregated >workloads is pretty much immaterial (again, IMO) and of course as usual, YMMV. When I implemented GOAL MODE at the Bank of Nova Scotia in 1999, there were a lot of deficiencies. Mixing TSO, Onlines, and Batch were on

Re: Job Mix (was: Speaking of SDSF)

2006-09-23 Thread Mark Zelden
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:51:15 -0400, Craddock, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >To this day, many (perhaps even most) customers still segregate >applications and workloads between systems. Application X (e.g. "TSO") >runs on SYSA and application Y (e.g. CICS Online) run on SYSB. Now if >you spe

HP and false emails

2006-09-23 Thread Phil Payne
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8209-2371686,00.html "Mr Hurd's part in the so-called "tracer email" scandal was disclosed at a press conference after the US markets closed last night. Investigators looking into boardroom leaks planted fictitious emails with journalists, hoping they

Re: IODF Definitions for ICP

2006-09-23 Thread Alan Altmark
On Saturday, 09/23/2006 at 10:05 AST, Douglas Shupe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The very best way to get comfortable with the ICP IOGEN is to read the > PEER-TO-PEER document written by John Huges WSC. > If you like I can send a copy, link unknown, maybe Alan can hunt it up. It > is a GREAT pap

Re: DSS RESTORE - how to enforce CONTIG

2006-09-23 Thread John Kington
>So the solution would be... if you want the dataset in 1 extent restore the dataset to an empty volume. You might be able to get DSS to restore to a single extent if you preallocate the dataset and use the REPLACE parameter during the restore. Regards, John -

Re: Job Mix (was: Speaking of SDSF)

2006-09-23 Thread Bob Shannon
>FWIW, I have been at many shops without the type of segregation Ted is >talking about and WLM does a fine job of managing the workloads. I prefer to roll maintenance to a test system before a production system. Once can only test a limited amount in a sysprog sandbox. I agree that WLM can handle