I am in a catch 22 situation. When I add the following to BPXPRMxx, TCP
lose access to OSA cards, but if I drop it, I get msg EDC8114I ADDRESS
FAMILY NOT SUPPORTED.
Required BPXPRMxx update:
NETWORK DOMAINNAME(AF_UNIX)
DOMAINNUMBER(1)
MAXSOCKETS(
Sent to various distribution lists (sorry about any duplications)
If you are interested in IEEE's draft standard for "decimal floating point"
(and related topics), please note that they have extended their deadline to
try and get an even broader audience for the upcoming ballot.
-Original Me
On Oct 8, 2006, at 8:50 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
--SNIP--
What's a programming language? Must it have variables, assignment
statements, loops, GOTOs, ...? LISP 1.0 has none of those, yet
is generally deemed a programming language. I know no troff, so
Art
If you know that you are running on a z/Architecture machine, then you
could use the STore Facility List (STFL) instruction to help you decide
what is available or not (though this does lead to dual- pathing your code
which you may not want to do)
STFL is priviliged but z/OS does issue it and
Ed
One small correction - the long displacement instructions were retrofitted
to the z900 machines so they are available on all z/Architecture machines.
The caveat is that on the z900/z800 machines, the performance of these
instructions is SLOW.
Regards
John R Dravnieks
HLASM Project leader,
Au
In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
> Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 21:14:33 -0300
>
> Unless there is another language with the same name, troff is not a
> programming language. nroff and troff are the Unix spinoffs from
> runoff, and format marked-up text. Sort of like Script on
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 10/06/2006
at 06:29 PM, Crispin Hugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>How do I get system LOGR to be created on the pack of my choice?
Through SMS or throuh esoterics.
>so I look at SMS. I do NOT want these files on an SMS managed pack.
Then wy are you looking at SMS?
>
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 10/06/2006
at 06:01 AM, Charles Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Shmuel, I still think you have this wrong.
Have you run a test?
>It issues an IDENTIFY EP=ZZZ.
For what address? If it's in the LPA then it's treated differently,
and you may be SOL. Otherwise, ...
>
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 10/06/2006
at 11:33 AM, "Eric N. Bielefeld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I just went to the web site posted previously. If you click on
>advanced search, they list 33 programming languages, plus the choice
>of all programming languages. They list Lex, Limbo, lua, Ma
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 10/06/2006
at 04:22 PM, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Since it's an acronym, not a word, we get to make up whatever rules
>we want for pluralization.
Pluralization isn't the issue; obfuscation is. If you want to refer
to, e.g., MIPSs, MIPSes, MIPSen, that m
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 10/05/2006
at 07:29 PM, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Non-PWD members are not supposed to be in possession of the dongle
>and are not licensed to use z/Architecture on the box even if they
>*do* possess it. (An agreement with IBM to the contrary overrides
The task you ran got an S878 which is usually a REGION size issue. You need
to make the region= parameter on this task BIGGER. You can use tools like
LOOKAT to find out what system abend or error messages mean.
Lizette Koehler
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mai
Anthony
The relevant manual is z/OS V1R8.0 MVS System Codes - or, ideally, whatever
z/OS level you are using - followed by searching for "System Completion
Code"[1] 878:
2.504 878
878
Explanation: The error occurred when the system was trying to do one of the
following:
- Satisfy a reques
i need help with i am geting :
-QLUSER1S LOG5 00 37 24.00.0
IEA705I ERROR DURING GETMAIN SYS CODE = 878-10 QLUSER1S DDDE
IEA705I 00F90280 007C0C48 007C0C48 1200 00D29240
IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 707
Zoran Trifunovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Main
In a message dated 10/8/2006 2:58:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
can some help me with 878-10 .
i am geting :
>>
Raise the REGION= for step LOG5
IEA705I ERROR DURING {GETMAIN|FREEMAIN}, SYS CODE= cde-rc {jobname|aaa}
stepname fb w1w2w3w4w5w6
Explanation: Th
can some help me with 878-10 .
i am geting :
-QLUSER1S LOG5 00 37 24.00.0
IEA705I ERROR DURING GETMAIN SYS CODE = 878-10 QLUSER1S DDDE
IEA705I 00F90280 007C0C48 007C0C48 1200 00D29240
IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 707
-
T
For the present, I generally use the ESA/390 PoP as the "rulebook." If it's
there then it's safe to use (even if its listed under a feature, as long as
it's non-privileged). Any code that I write will likely be in a new release of
Product "X" and it's highly unlikely any customer that's paying
Bruce,
I will have to agree with you for the most part. The FDR manuals are
pretty good and when they don't answer the question a call to your
(Innovation) TS line gets an answer usually faster than finding it in
the manual. I have not been keeping up with INNOVATIONs'
documentation but t
It's not very user-friendly to add another couple of pounds to
Innovation's already large manuals !
Amen. The manuals are already large (blame me, I am the author of most
of it, and I tend to be wordy). Even if you read them in softcopy, it
is daunting to read thru all the text and options
if you look in the migration manual, it should tell you about using the DIFF
command
to check out your /etc versus the serverpac /etc.
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Leong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:46 PM
Subject: c
>As as predicted last year, the entry point for current hardware is now
the >2066-0A1 at 80 MIPS
Your own charts show a z9-BC R07 A01 is rated at approximately 26 MIPS.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>snippage
> Today, however, I deleted in DSLIST a VSAM data set which was
> migrated. To my surprise, DSLIST merely issued HDELETE which
> deleted the VSAM data set with no ISRUVPC9 options dialog.
> Now I'm perplexed:
>
> o If ISRUVPC9 is important, it should be issued
> And what about always posting about how cheap the hardware is getting?
If the hardware (processor) were free it would make little difference.
"As as predicted last year, the entry point for current hardware is now the
2066-0A1 at 80
MIPS - the 40 MIPS 2066-0E1 being non-viable because of the m
23 matches
Mail list logo
