I'm inclined to give the OP the BOTD also. But one point of
clarification...
Are they looking for a list of changes? Or are they looking for e.g the
latest SMF manual?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
Performance Consultant
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
+44-20-8832-5167
+44-7802-245-584
[EMAIL
The difference between what you get with DB2 V7 and SMF 101 vs DB2 V8 and
PROJECTCPU might be interesting...
I believe the former would be from measuring the appropriate CPU for DDF
and ESTIMATING from there - and might be detailed enough to tell you which
applications. (I've not seen the
We inadvertently caused our alternate coupler volume to go offline. The
Primary pack data sets were fine.
When I attempted to restore them using the SETXCF
COUPLE,TYPE=(ARM),ACOUPLE=(SYS1.SCPLX1.ARM.CDS02)
I was presented with the following messages:
SETXCF
A reply of U would be acceptable in this case. It's a matter of
time-stamps not agreeing, etc. If you had a second SYSPLEX active
sharing the same DASD, then I'd be busily checking that this dataset was
not, in fact, in use by the other SYSPLEX.
Rick
Fortunately, there are no other sysplexes other than this one SCPLX1.
However, I knew that since this was the ACOUPLE datasets that were affected,
and we were running fine on the primary ones, I just went ahead and did a
delete, Define (using the utility) and then issued the SETXCF
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007p.html#39 Inda is outsourcing jobs as well
Why Is US Grad School Mainly Non-US Students?
http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/07/09/29/2027210.shtml
from above:
I am a new graduate student in Computer Engineering. I would like to get my
MS and possibly my
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:44:44 +0100, Martin Packer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm inclined to give the OP the BOTD also. But one point of
clarification...
Are they looking for a list of changes? Or are they looking for e.g the
latest SMF manual?
Cheers, Martin
The SMF Manual will list the
The PSI head line I saw sounds like stuff I heard from PSI at least two years
ago. So what was 'NEW'? You missed my sarcasm.
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:28:06 -0500, Eric Bielefeld eric-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenneth,
IBM has allowed you to run Linux on an IBM mainframe back to the 9672.
This
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:56:03 -0500, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I disagree. Barb may very well be under pressure from management that
expects certain condition codes and messages. These same managers may
well fall under the category of PHB (pointy-head boss) and have very
little idea
Errol Van staden writes:
has anyone noticed a trend in IBMs strategy in shifting the focus of the
mainframe to very large users such as outsourcers etc? I am talking about
features such as IRD, group capacity limits, and sysplex aggregation
pricing
benefits. Could they be bolstering though
You may also run the z/OS Bimodal Migration Accommodation Offering (i.e.
run z/OS 1.4 in 31-bit mode) on the System z9 for a period not to exceed
one year. Since you're coming from a z900 presumably that doesn't apply,
but for those of you coming off 31-bit systems it may be useful. This
helps
http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=601
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
12 matches
Mail list logo
