G'day Michael - this is an ugly hack. But you knew that already.
Weights being merely guess-timates, I normally set them (for all LPARs) to
what you want the box divvied up as when all LPARs are (concurrently) 100%
busy. In your case, maybe set the CF LPAR to slightly higher, just for
sanity - t
On Tue, 13 May 2008 05:43:24 +, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think you have some terminology problems.
>CF LPARs are NOT dummies.
>If you are truly using them as CFs, they should not be used in this manner.
>
It is OK
What he means , is , he does not need any CF , but he wants to
There are lots of ways to provide alternative user interfaces to CICS. The
"best" answer will depend at least a little bit on what development
approach you prefer. Questions people might ask to determine the best
choice include: How are you generating BMS macros today? Do you need to
maintain "dual
At 15:19 -0600 on 05/12/2008, Steve Comstock wrote about Re:
Mainframe programming vs the Web:
Yeah, I thought about that. Actually built a prototype. I'll think about it.
I do know that not all browsers recognize NOSCRIPT, but those are probably
in the minorty.
To the best of my knowledge, t
At 21:17 + on 05/12/2008, =?utf-8?B?VGVkIE1hY05FSUw=?= wrote
about Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web:
Is it truly being a luddite to not want your PC screwed over by
bad/malicious external code?
What type of things are/were done to your system by the supplied
JavaScript? I think you a
>Upgrading capacity of z890 but capping total MSUs of existing 2 LPARs to 26
>MSUs, but also not wanting to cap each LPAR as such (i.e. each LPAR could
get the whole 26 MSUs if the other LPAR is idle). Therefore using the dummy CF
LPAR to consume the MSUs we do not want to be charged for.
I thi
On Mon, 12 May 2008 23:34:11 -0500, Cwi Jeret wrote:
>Attached are the Commands I used with the results.
>Again, the problem is that CFRM still has the allocations on
>CF2 which used to be on 2094 .
>Now CF2 is on 2097, therfore the CF is not connected, preventing
>any action on its structures !
Hello Alan ,
You wrote :
"We realized we'd seen this situation when going to DR so we ended up
deleting the CFRM datasets and reloading them with the new policy and
then ipling the sysplex."
I like this solution, but isn't it possible to perform this without the
entire SYSPLEX IPL ?
As our probl
Thanks Kevin for Your detailed answer .
Attached are the Commands I used with the results.
Again, the problem is that CFRM still has the allocations on
CF2 which used to be on 2094 .
Now CF2 is on 2097, therfore the CF is not connected, preventing
any action on its structures !
-d xcf,str,stat
>But what would be a good weight for the CF LPAR so it always consume a
fixed number of MSUs (capped of course).
>>CF's do not contribute to MSU charging.
>>They should always be allowed to run without any form of capping or
sharing.
>>What problem are you trying to solve?
Upgrading capacity o
Thanks Bill.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Klein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:41 PM
Subject: Fw: CICS/BMS greenies to GUI's
This note was posted directly to the USENET newsgroup and hasn't had many
replies. I am forwardi
On 12 May 2008 15:03:41 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>It's un-American not to have a one syllable nickname. ;-)
>
>On the other hand, legal names have to be accommodated whether it's COBOL
>on punch cards or entry fields on a web window. It would be nice to see
>some sincere concern
There are probably outstanding failed persistent connections to the CF
that you need to delete. Use the command
d xcf,cf,cfname=CF2
to get a list of structures that XCF thinks is allocated on that CF. Then
you can use the command
d xcf,str,strname=
to get a list of connections to that struc
IBM has a webcast scheduled at 2:00 p.m. Eastern U.S. (New York) time on
May 22, 2008, focused on how to deliver and improve operational business
intelligence on System z. Business intelligence needs are maturing rapidly,
and for increasing numbers of businesses it is no longer acceptable to wait
u
This note was posted directly to the USENET newsgroup and hasn't had many
replies. I am forwarding it to the list-server, to see if more people have
input on it. (It is also in the comp.lang.cobol newsgroup).
"Graham Hobbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hello
>But what would be a good weight for the CF LPAR so it always consume a fixed
>number of MSUs (capped of course).
CF's do not contribute to MSU charging.
They should always be allowed to run without any form of capping or sharing.
What problem are you trying to solve?
-
Too busy driving to stop
Arthur T. wrote:
I'm not an expert, so I let Google do the work. Some of the
exploits are old, but they do or did exist. Here's just a sample:
As you may of noticed - most of the security issues are 'implementation'
issues - not design issues..
Now, the same goes for "Real Language"
We wish to follow the advice given in an earlier to cap MSU usage of our 2
LPARs (2 monoplexes) by intoducing a dummy CF LPAR when we upgrade our
z890. I understand we should SET DYNDISP OFF.
But what would be a good weight for the CF LPAR so it always consume a
fixed number of MSUs (capped of
Off the top of my head, I believe you have to tell VTAM that there are separate
inbound and outbound paths between the two nodes. Sounds like you're
configuration has forced your links to be half-duplex.
db
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
>Javascript is not JAVA! Chant it if it helps you to remember...
Admittingly, I'm not an expert (I said that).
My point was that both seem to be exposures.
I've seen posts that both have security issues.
I deferr to the experts on this.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
---
> >What EXACTLY do you claim that JavaScript can do that is
> >dangerous? It has no ability to access the Hard Drive (so
> >it can not look at your files) or things like that.
>
> According to other posters, it can.
> Since I'm not a JAVA expert, I'll defer to their expertise.
Javascript is not J
>What EXACTLY do you claim that JavaScript can do that is
>dangerous? It has no ability to access the Hard Drive (so
>it can not look at your files) or things like that.
According to other posters, it can.
Since I'm not a JAVA expert, I'll defer to their expertise.
-
Too busy driving to stop fo
As a USS program, FTP probably uses the C library's time functions,
which don't know about the z/OS PARMLIB setting!
You probably have to set the TZ environment variable if you want to
see local time. Use the ENVAR() LE parm option (or via CEEOPTS if
you are running 1.7+).
You would think that a
On 12 May 2008 14:14:14 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert A. Rosenberg) wrote:
At 16:38 +0100 on 05/12/2008, Martin Packer wrote about
Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web:
Javascript, by design, can do damn near anything to your
mach
It's un-American not to have a one syllable nickname. ;-)
On the other hand, legal names have to be accommodated whether it's COBOL
on punch cards or entry fields on a web window. It would be nice to see
some sincere concern for the end user. AKA the one who pays for the
'service'.
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 13:15 -0400, Steven Conway wrote:
> Skipping multiple releases, going thru those same multiple releases'
> migration and planning guides, almost a guarantee I'll miss something.
I tend to rely on Marnas (fantastic) offering in lieu of the "official"
guides - more so where m
I think John wins the prize! I just IPLed my sandbox moving the local
time 2 hours to the west and the FTP client still put a GMT timestamp on
the member it put into the PDS. The programmer who reported it to me
reported it as a z/OS 1.7 upgrade issue and since I have no 1.4 LPARs
left, I couldn'
In a message dated 5/12/2008 4:13:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Novel before getting to your message. Based on this memory, and on
impulse, I just right now bought a copy so I can reread it. Copies
are available from Amazon if you want to reread it yourself.
>>
Yes, I have had the HFS protected by ACF2 for a least 2 years or more.
This is fairly common. Try the ACF2 list on Yahoo for help on ACF2
Doug Fuerst
Subject: CA ACF2 SAF HFS Security and COCSTS32
[snip]
Has anyone implemented ACF2 CA SAF HFS Security and setup the resource
rul
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 09:51 -0600 on 05/12/2008, Steve Comstock wrote about Re: Mainframe
programming vs the Web:
It's a real dilema for webpage developers. I recently redesigned
our home page. My initial design was to be very minimalist, just
a few lines, but if you clicked a line it
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 4:01 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web
>
> In a case of this type, all you need to do is place a
>The normal user gets an interactive copy of the page while the Paranoid
>Luddites get a
non-interactive static page.
Is it truly being a luddite to not want your PC screwed over by bad/malicious
external code?
I've been hit too many times, and I know better.
Our security people know even more
At 11:27 -0500 on 05/12/2008, Chase, John wrote about Re: Mainframe
programming vs the Web:
> -Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
[ snip ]
I did work for a company that had to clean up addresses - it
had a dirty word file that it use
At 16:38 +0100 on 05/12/2008, Martin Packer wrote about Re: Mainframe
programming vs the Web:
Javascript, by design, can do damn near anything to your machine.
What EXACTLY do you claim that JavaScript can do that is dangerous?
It has no ability to access the Hard Drive (so it can not look a
At 09:51 -0600 on 05/12/2008, Steve Comstock wrote about Re:
Mainframe programming vs the Web:
It's a real dilema for webpage developers. I recently redesigned
our home page. My initial design was to be very minimalist, just
a few lines, but if you clicked a line it was expanded, using
javascri
At 09:59 -0600 on 05/12/2008, Howard Brazee wrote about Re: Mainframe
programming vs the Web:
Around 1968 I read a book where this guy had a long hyphenated name
which the computers kept having troubles with. He invented a
bacterium that ate computer tapes for revenge - which made him an
ecol
We also went throught this situation recently. After the Cf swap, the sysplex
still had a pending situation, waiting for the now non-existent CF to come
online. Approximately 100 hours after the CF swap, it suddenly cleared itself
with no other manual intervention, all pending status's completed
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:07 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Probably a basic TCP/IP question
>
> Sorry for a basic question, but where does the FTP client get
Fred Hoffman wrote:
Does anyone know whether z/os 1.9 will be offered to PWD members. The last
release I have is 1.8.
TIA,
Fred Hoffman
We installed z/OS 1.9 on our zPad last month. Came as part of
the Cornerstone / FLEX-es / PWD package. Not sure who does
which part, to tell you the truth.
So would I set this in the /etc/init.options file?
Thanks.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fletcher, Kevin
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Probably a basic TCP/IP question
Jack,
Does anyone know whether z/os 1.9 will be offered to PWD members. The last
release I have is 1.8.
TIA,
Fred Hoffman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the me
It's being run as a batch job so /etc/profile isn't a player.
Batch doesn't make any difference, you just have batch UNIX. 'tis a brave
new world...
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:29 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Probably a basic TCP/IP question
>
> Jack,
>
> I forgot to mention one item. It's being run
Jack,
I forgot to mention one item. It's being run as a batch job so
/etc/profile isn't a player.
Rex
Rex,
I still believe it runs through the FTP (usually called FTPD) STC, and
that will use the TZ envrionment variable.
Fletch
---
Jack,
I forgot to mention one item. It's being run as a batch job so
/etc/profile isn't a player.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Kelly
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Proba
On 12 May 2008 11:33:26 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>Edward E Jaffe wrote:
>
>> That is -- and AFAIK has always been -- the VIO trade-off. CPU time for
>> clock time.
>
>Yes, that's right. And VIO should be compared and contrasted with other
>DIM techniques for Batch. I've a feeli
Sorry for a basic question, but where does the FTP client get it's
timestamp information from? I have a programmer who just performed an
FTP GET command to a PDS member. The ISPF statistics were updated with
the FTP GET. Unfortunately, the timestamp placed on the member is 5
hours into the fut
On 12 May 2008 10:35:48 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>You are correct that this auditing must be done. This "Application Auditing"
>must include not just what a RACF log would show - that someone had access to
>a file, but to show exactly what the user saw. It is one thing to kno
but where does the FTP client get it's timestamp information from?
FTP belongs to the brave UNIX world. Sounds like you don't have
TZ=EST5EDT
export TZ
set in etc profile or are not executing it..
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
-
Report: HP to buy EDS for $12-13 billion (possibly to be announced as early as
tomorrow?)
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9942051-7.html
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
sen
Sorry for a basic question, but where does the FTP client get it's
timestamp information from? I have a programmer who just performed an
FTP GET command to a PDS member. The ISPF statistics were updated with
the FTP GET. Unfortunately, the timestamp placed on the member is 5
hours into the futur
On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:09:18 -0500, McKown, John
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>The other thing that irritates many is the US (and English?) centric
>"First Name", "Middle Name (or initial)", "Last Name". ...
"First Name", "Middle Initial", "Last Name" has always bothered me.
And those (admit
> From what I understand about JAVA vs. JAVASCRIPT, which I freely
admit
> may be a faulty understanding, there are important differences.
Javascript and JAVA are apples and fish. It's like CLIST versus COBOL.
There are some similar semantic constructs but that's about all.
Javascript is just a s
You are correct that this auditing must be done. This "Application Auditing"
must include not just what a RACF log would show - that someone had access to a
file, but to show exactly what the user saw. It is one thing to know that
someone logged in, accessed a sensitive file and logged out lat
Edward E Jaffe wrote:
> That is -- and AFAIK has always been -- the VIO trade-off. CPU time for
> clock time.
Yes, that's right. And VIO should be compared and contrasted with other
DIM techniques for Batch. I've a feeling I wrote a blog post about it a
few months ago. I should've because I us
In a message dated 5/12/2008 12:17:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I used to call the "DIM Coffee Table Book" :-) showed VIO to Expanded
Storage burnt CPU compared to doing it to straight temp data sets on disk.
For MOST data points.
>>
There used to be some
Yup, it was. Definitely a local (my) error, not IBM's.
My post was an observation that, while some migration actions may be
ignored, this one can't.
Skipping multiple releases, going thru those same multiple releases'
migration and planning guides, almost a guarantee I'll miss something. Not
Ed,
Customer feedback for elapsed time follows:
Actually the elapsed time was substantially shorter for the VIO tests:
- the VIO tests both executed in .02 min
- the physical IO tests executed in .05 and .07 min
Still I rather doubt that they will pay for the quicker turn around.
___
I expect it's because VIO requires cycles. Definitely true when simulating
a device in memory. Quite possibly also true when doing VIO to page data
sets on disk.
What I used to call the "DIM Coffee Table Book" :-) showed VIO to Expanded
Storage burnt CPU compared to doing it to straight temp da
Ed,
Thank you for the response.
I doubt paging would be an issue on this machine.
The user did not report back on elapsed times. I suspect when he saw the
charges for the job had doubled, elapsed time took secondary importance.
From: Edward Jaffe [mailto:[E
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote:
Ed,
Customer feedback for elapsed time follows:
Actually the elapsed time was substantially shorter for the VIO tests:
- the VIO tests both executed in .02 min
- the physical IO tests executed in .05 and .07 min
Still I rather doubt that they will pay
_
From: Carlson, Steven
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 10:07 AM
To: Donnelly, John P
Subject: IBMMAIN Question
John:
I found this question in IBMMAIN, and would like to send it again.
Has anyone implemented the CA-ACF2 SAF HFS security facility to
replace Unix security in
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote:
We are running Z/os 1.7. It recently came to my attention that VIO had been
implemented in such a way that temp datasets no matter how small ALWAYS went to
DASD. One of my predessesors used a storclas with Guaranteed Space. Anyway a
user asked to be able
We did this recently. Removed the old processor without moving the
structures before shutting down.
We realized we'd seen this situation when going to DR so we ended up
deleting the CFRM datasets and reloading them with the new policy and
then ipling the sysplex.
For us this was the cleanest an
We are running Z/os 1.7. It recently came to my attention that VIO had been
implemented in such a way that temp datasets no matter how small ALWAYS went to
DASD. One of my predessesors used a storclas with Guaranteed Space. Anyway a
user asked to be able to use VIO so I turned it on. Today he co
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John P Donnelly
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 11:06 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: CA ACF2 SAF HFS Security and COCSTS32
>
[snip]
>
> Has anyone implemented ACF2 CA SAF HFS Sec
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
>
> [ snip ]
>
> I did work for a company that had to clean up addresses - it
> had a dirty word file that it used - but I've read of some
> foreign "dirty
> words" that are valid places and names. .
On Fri, 9 May 2008 15:49:02 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
>Tom Marchant wrote:
>> Yuck!
>>
>> ITYM
>> TMFLCEFACILITIESLISTBYTE2,FLCEEXTENDEDIMMEDIATE
>>
>
>Personally, I prefer to use the mixed case symbols from the PL/X expansions:
>
> TMFlceFacilitiesListByte2,FlceExtendedImmed
On Mon, 12 May 2008 16:05:48 +, John P Donnelly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Has anyone implemented ACF2 CA SAF HFS Security and setup the resource
>rules for the HFS directories?
>Is there a better way to protect the HFS directories from the
>application programming staff?
>
Better? That is
Rick Fochtman wrote:
I hope you're not suggesting javascript is evil and to be avoided at
all costs. And I do hope you'll trust IBMLink in that regard.
Note: I haven't even bothered to Ctrl+U or Ctrl+Shift+I IBMLInk so
I've no idea what it's using jav
This was documented on pp 236 of the migration guide
Went to z/OS 1.9 yesterday on our main DEV system, which also runs
some
PROD batch. One of our Capacity & Performance RMF processing jobs got
an
S806 on module ERBPPSRT. It was pointed out years ago (in this forum)
that this sort exit i
John,
For multiple states beginning with the same letter, keep pressing the first
letter Four or five times for Arizonagrin
Bill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chase, John
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:55 AM
T
We are currently converting from CICS TS1.3 to CICS TS3.2, and we want
to implement ACF2 CA SAF HFS Security.
There is an ACF2 Tool ACFHFSRP which generates resource rules for all
HFS directories. This tool does not create the
NEXTKEY entries for CICSTS32 XML directories which is over 4000 lines.
On 12 May 2008 08:21:52 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve
Comstock) wrote:
>I once met an instructor in San Francisco whose name was
>something_or_other III. He decided the III was the only
>part that gave him uniqueness. He had his name legally
>changed to '3'. Failed a lot of validation tests on m
On 12 May 2008 08:20:36 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John) wrote:
>Don't forget the "multi-word" surnames, like Van de Graaf, de la Hoya,
>etc. I'm sure those folks tire from receiving form-letter
>acknowledgements that start with "Dear Mr. Van:" or "Dear Mr. de:".
I'm doing case conversions
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 10:27 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web
[snip]
> present. I've got a serious problem with that; I wis
Only in chrome. I.e. in a Firefox extension. The capabilities of other
javascript environments are very much restricted.
Martin Packer
Performance Consultant
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
+44-20-8832-5167
+44-7802-245-584
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
"Arthur T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA
I hope you're not suggesting javascript is evil and to be avoided at all
costs. And I do hope you'll trust IBMLink in that regard.
Note: I haven't even bothered to Ctrl+U or Ctrl+Shift+I IBMLInk so I've no
idea what it's using javascript for. Hopefully
In a message dated 5/12/2008 9:31:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
circumvent this rocky road when we come back up with everything else intact
but for the CFs. OP's experience suggests otherwise. I now have to rethink
the whole process.
>>
Almost like we need a 'col
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
>
> [ snip ] Also, it annoys me that (I have done this on occasion)
> the sites don't validate the combination of state and zip
> code. Especially since the drop-downs aren't always in the
> same or
Mariuca Iftime wrote:
It is no PTF available for ZOS 1.9, only ZOS 1.4
z/OS 1.4 is no longer in service. The oldest supported release is z/OS
1.7; end of service for that release is scheduled for this September.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Su
Arthur T. wrote:
Java is safe, at least theoretically, because it runs in its own
virtual machine. Javascript, by design, can do damn near anything to
your machine.
I'm not sure I agree here.
Java is safe only to the point where
- core classes are properly implemented to prevent unau
Morning, All.
Went to z/OS 1.9 yesterday on our main DEV system, which also runs some
PROD batch. One of our Capacity & Performance RMF processing jobs got an
S806 on module ERBPPSRT. It was pointed out years ago (in this forum)
that this sort exit in SYS1.SERBLINK had been replaced by ERBPP
McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web
On 11 May 2008 14:26:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Da
In a message dated 5/11/2008 5:39:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cursor would be in the first field the user needed to fix. I hate web
pages that say "Correct errors in red" If the error is a blank, you
can't find it. With our technique, you knew which fields w
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
> >
> > On 11 May 2008 14:26:06 -0700, David Alcock wrote:
> >
> > >Ever since the Web came along I've
This thread comes at a pivotal point for us because we're looking at the
same sort of CEC swap-out in the near future. When we conducted our first
DR test 10 years ago, we experienced very much the same problem: fully
mirrored couple data sets were convinced that we had somehow left the old
CFs off
On 12 May 2008 01:55:00 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Packer) wrote:
I hope you're not suggesting javascript is evil and to be
avoided at all costs. And I do hope you'll trust IBMLink
in that regard.
Remember, you're not just
Gil,
I think in this context, the "new and nifty" and "PC-weenie" comments were
based on the fact that in the eyes of most non-mainframers, these things are
"new and nifty" despite the fact that they have been common-place in CICS
and IMS applications for almost 40 years. Similar to the contempt m
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:03 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web
>
> On 11 May 2008 14:26:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David
> A
On 11 May 2008 14:26:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David
Alcock) wrote:
>Ever since the Web came along I've been annoyed by those web
>sites that won't accept spaces or dashes like for credit cards
>and phone numbers. I know that even ancient mainframe COBOL has
>support for removing them with one
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 12:59 -0400, Arthur T. wrote:
> On 9 May 2008 06:21:05 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> (Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (F. J. Kelley) wrote:
>
> >Anyway, I've been asked if I can provide banners ...
> >sheesh ...
> >The kind printed on fanfold (ie gr
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mariuca Iftime
>
> It is no PTF available for ZOS 1.9, only ZOS 1.4
PTF List:
Release 740 : UA40682 available 08/05/07 (1000 ) <== 1.9
Release 750 : PTF not available yet <== 1.10
Release 75
>From:John Mattson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: ServerPac and zFS
>EZZ4203I Z/OS UNIX - TCP/IP CONNECTION ERROR FOR
>TCPIP-BPX1PCT,800D,,0079,11B3005A
>EZZ4203I Z/OS UNIX - TCP/IP CONNECTION ERROR FOR
>TCPIP-BPX1PCT,C005,,0079,11B3005A
>EZZ9315E TCP/IP WA
Mullen, Patrick wrote:
>I thought this would be straight forward, but I can't get it to work
>correctly.
Trying to FTP a DSORG=VB dataset from one z/OS 1.7 system to another z/OS
1.7 system. The dataset contains alphabetic and packed decimal data.
>With no special commands, some of the packed
I have to ask, did you run the PSP bucket for z10? We just went through
this upgrade, and the list was pretty long, and included ICSF
maintenance.
___
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President
Mainframe Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
T
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Packer) writes:
> As a big Firefox fan (writing extensions and living on the BLEEDING edge
> by running Nightlies) I wonder if IE even HA
I hope you're not suggesting javascript is evil and to be avoided at all
costs. And I do hope you'll trust IBMLink in that regard.
Note: I haven't even bothered to Ctrl+U or Ctrl+Shift+I IBMLInk so I've no
idea what it's using javascript for. Hopefully dojo.
Martin
Martin Packer
Performance Co
Disabling javascript will leave you disenfranchised from an increasingly
large number of (increasingly important) websites. But at least you have
an extension to make this SELECTIVE.
As a big Firefox fan (writing extensions and living on the BLEEDING edge
by running Nightlies) I wonder if IE ev
99 matches
Mail list logo