IND$FILE question

2010-07-17 Thread Ed Gould
I vaguely remember  (A LONG TIME AGO mind you) that there was a separately installable FMID for IND$FILE (bonus points for the year it came out) Does anyone remember this? As a side question there was a separate help member in sys1.help (vague recollection here) Does(did?) IBM still ship the Help

Re: DFHSM, Control-O, and Top Secret issue

2010-07-17 Thread Doron Geva
Bill It seems that the security in the rule is SEC=TRIGGER, you may have to change it to SEC=OWNER *Best Regards Doron Geva *Consulting & Developing on z/OS system Mobile: +972-54-4974548 Mail: doron.geva...@gmail.com On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:48, Bill Johnson wrote: > Control-O already

Re: EGL generation was Re: COBOL vs. Java

2010-07-17 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>I THINK that some LE runtime components are COBOL specific and may be extra >cost. I don't believe that's the case. But, the last time I looked was 2005. - I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation! Kimota! -- For IB

Re: 2 versus 4 processors

2010-07-17 Thread Edward Jaffe
Crispin Hugo wrote: Hi, We are hopefully going from a z9 to z10 processor. I would like to have 4 CP's instead of our current 2 CP's so our configuration is more flexible. We are not worried about licensing costs of multiple processors. The overall MIPage would be the same, whether we have 2 or 4

Re: EGL generation

2010-07-17 Thread john gilmore
Clark Morris wrote: | I THINK that some LE components are COBOL specific | and may be extra cost. He is half right. The LE does have some COBOL-specific run-time components, for COBOL-specific BIFs in particular, and many COBOL-specific entries in its common run-time components, but they ar

Re: EGL generation was Re: COBOL vs. Java

2010-07-17 Thread Clark Morris
On 16 Jul 2010 19:21:48 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:17 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >> > using Java would allow elimination of the licenses for COBOL and runtimes >> >> COBOL runtime generally speaking is called Language Environment, right? It's >> pretty m

Re: Access to RACF entries dataset. Operation attribute

2010-07-17 Thread Robert S. Hansel (RSH)
Barry & Jorge, Barry, CREATE authority to a group will allow a user to create a dataset with an HLQ matching the group name even when the user is permitted less than ALTER access to the group's dataset profiles. CONNECT and JOIN authority will do the same since they include CREATE authority. OPERA

Re: COBOL vs. Java

2010-07-17 Thread Timothy Sipples
>I recently heard a rumour at our site about IBM not recommending >the use of java with DB2 on the mainframe Whoa, stop there. Did you ask your friend what drugs he's taking? :-) Once your friend sobers up, you might want to point him here: http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/solutions/editions/ws/