Re: New IBM Memory surper fast?

2011-01-08 Thread Ed Gould
--- On Tue, 1/4/11, Paul Gilmartin wrote: From: Paul Gilmartin Subject: Re: New IBM Memory surper fast? To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: Tuesday, January 4, 2011, 1:12 AM On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 22:35:36 -0800, Ed Gould wrote: > http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2374767,00.asp >Super Memory

Re: can I dynamically increase tso size

2011-01-08 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
On 1/8/2011 8:55 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote: That formula seems to assume RECFM=FB. Since the RECFM is VB, the formula would seem to me to actually be (Number of records*40) + File-Size. Since the average file size is 33 bytes not 5000 bytes, that FB formula yields 70MB (which is also what my

Re: can I dynamically increase tso size

2011-01-08 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 08:22 -0500 on 01/08/2011, Bob Rutledge wrote about Re: can I dynamically increase tso size: Robert A. Rosenberg wrote: At 15:13 -0500 on 01/07/2011, Bob Rutledge wrote about Re: can I dynamically increase tso size: Krishnan wrote: Hi All I am having a similar problem. I am unable to e

Re: can I dynamically increase tso size

2011-01-08 Thread Big Iron
I have not tried this since 2009 but if the user is able to access Unix System Services and the environment is _BPX_SHAREAS=YES, then you could dynamically increase the TSO region size by increasing rlimit_as (address space size). Sample REXX code at http://billlalonde.tripod.com/rexx/setrlim.txt

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-08 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 17:34:34 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >In , on 01/07/2011 > at 03:36 PM, Binyamin Dissen said: > >>This issue is that the binder considers this kind of error to be >>merely a warning. > >What kind of error and why should it be more than a warning? > Why should it be

Re: CMS Sort Descending?

2011-01-08 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In , on 01/07/2011 at 05:42 PM, Paul Gilmartin said: >So how does ISPF store the year in PDS directories? Recklessly? In less than 100 centuries there will be problems. >Y10K is not a concern because it's unlikely the Gregorian calendar >will be in use at that time. And if it is in use, we'

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-08 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In , on 01/07/2011 at 03:36 PM, Binyamin Dissen said: >This issue is that the binder considers this kind of error to be >merely a warning. What kind of error and why should it be more than a warning? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: REXX, the new Cobol ?

2011-01-08 Thread Don Leahy
Rexx is indeed the new Cobol. It is stable, reliable and productive when used within the problem space for which it was designed. :-) On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 07:18, Shane Ginnane wrote: > Following on from my (most recent) jousting with Martin ... > > I find myself inexorably drifting away from

Kill the OT posts please

2011-01-08 Thread Darren Evans-Young
Just because it's Friday or you put OT in the subject line, does not mean it's ok to post off-topic subjects. Please kill the OT geological thread before it mushrooms. Thanks. And don't respond to this message either. Darren Evans-Young IBM-MAIN List Owner --

Re: CMS Sort Descending?

2011-01-08 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
jcew...@acm.org (Joel C. Ewing) writes: > ISPF directory dates are stored in the highly-peculiar IBM Julian Date > format variant used for SMF timestamps: a positive-signed PL4 field > currently defined as 0cyydddF. Although the formal definition at this > point only allows for "0c" being "00" for

Re: CMS Sort Descending?

2011-01-08 Thread Joel C. Ewing
On 01/07/2011 05:42 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:12:46 -0600, Joel C. Ewing wrote: On 01/07/2011 02:48 PM, Tony Harminc wrote: On 7 January 2011 14:36, Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:33:58 -0700, Larry Dinwiddie wrote: Run the following PIPE from your Ready p

Re: can I dynamically increase tso size

2011-01-08 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 08:22:33 -0500, Bob Rutledge wrote: > >Try it. > >Or search the archives of ISPF-L where you will find... > >"The amount of storage required by the ISPF editor approximates to the >following equation: > >(Number of records * (40 + record length)) > >Note that sites can limit the

Re: can I dynamically increase tso size

2011-01-08 Thread Bob Rutledge
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote: At 15:13 -0500 on 01/07/2011, Bob Rutledge wrote about Re: can I dynamically increase tso size: Krishnan wrote: Hi All I am having a similar problem. I am unable to edit a dataset and instead am getting the 'browse substituted message' The ISPF edit was attempte