> When you IPL a new operating system via autoipl (does that work?),
> is there any gotcha other than to remember to always CLPA?
When SADMP starts an IPL of MVS, it is essentially the same
as if you did a Load Clear from the HMC. We don't know or care
whether it is a new or old operating sy
I forgot to mention that SyzAuto/z provides complete 24x7 command and job and
task scheduling and we have over 300 site users.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.
You can also use the replacement for the freeware "CBT tape" AUTO called
SyzAUTO/z, which has many extra features and also has fixes for some of the
freeware product issues (midnight issue, fast processor support (the old one
was written for much slower processors in the 1980's),etc.) I maintai
We have about 11 TB on 18 TB of volumes for 11 LPars.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Shane wrote:
> LOL.
> I remember going to a Share/Guide presentation years ago by a bod from
> one of Australias larger sites. The talk was how they managed their
> humongous DASD farm that had recently passed t
LOL.
I remember going to a Share/Guide presentation years ago by a bod from
one of Australias larger sites. The talk was how they managed their
humongous DASD farm that had recently passed the Terabyte frontier.
Shock and awe from the assembled crowd :0)
Shane ...
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:55:
Ted,
I normally do not respond but since you were not in the same tone as it usually
is, I will say this.
I have in the past run into seemingly bright programmers that were convinced
that they knew better than MVS in how things should work. We had to fight tooth
and nail to stop them. It's ama
On 10/4/2011 7:42 AM, Staller, Allan wrote:
You can also check out the AUTO program on CBT file 098.
FWIW, that's what we use. Been working great for at least a decade.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
edja...
That would hold all data for 4 of our LPARS.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Edward Jaffe
wrote:
> Anyone running this yet?
>
> We have the necessary PTFs installed on our z/OS systems, but haven't
> upgraded the DS8100 hardware yet.
>
> Looks like fun! 8-)
>
> --
> Edward E Jaffe
> Phoenix Softw
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:48:15 -0700, Skip Robinson
wrote:
>When I run the AMDSADMP macro, I use options for zero operator
>intervention:
>
> ...CONSOLE=SYSC,REUSEDS=ALWAYS...
>
>This puts messages on the HMC operator console (no worry about device
>condition) and specifies that the new dump over
Anyone running this yet?
We have the necessary PTFs installed on our z/OS systems, but haven't upgraded
the DS8100 hardware yet.
Looks like fun! 8-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.co
When I run the AMDSADMP macro, I use options for zero operator
intervention:
...CONSOLE=SYSC,REUSEDS=ALWAYS...
This puts messages on the HMC operator console (no worry about device
condition) and specifies that the new dump overwrites any existing dump
without prompting. The title will alw
W dniu 2011-10-04 18:40, Ed Gould pisze:
Radoslaw,
What should have been asked is Why.
Unless you are writing a performance monitor (again why) there is no likely
reason as to why they need to know.
There are a lot of people that think they need to know this type of info,
especially applica
True. If he corrects it then it will just execute at the time(s) he expected.
Bad wording on my part since I was explaining the results he is currently
getting with a time earlier than his IPL.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Besides, it's a capacity metric.
Maybe not the best, but a start.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: David Andrews
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:33:30
To:
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subje
No, they will not execute immediately, only on the specified time
starting the next day.
Kees.
"Dennis Trojak" wrote in message
news:<3d40fdfc24014e459f11e569c730d98e010...@ntexmbapb.corp.radioshack.n
et>...
> That's because you issued the $TA commands for a time "earlier" than
the current time.
"David Andrews" wrote in message
news:<1317753210.14315.21.ca...@chuck.duda.com>...
> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 12:40 -0400, Ed Gould wrote:
> > What should have been asked is Why.
>
> Sorry, "why" is none of our concern. It is sufficient that Miklos
wants
> to know.
>
> --
> David Andrews
Not en
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 12:40 -0400, Ed Gould wrote:
> What should have been asked is Why.
Sorry, "why" is none of our concern. It is sufficient that Miklos wants
to know.
--
David Andrews
A. Duda & Sons, Inc.
david.andr...@duda.com
---
Please excuse the bandwidth...
2 renewable 1-year mainframe contracting positions available in LA area (local
government). These are positions with a great group of people downstairs from
me, and the contracts I would prefer except I can't abandon my current security
admin contract to bid on an
If you are on a recent release of z/OS you have the cron scheduler in your
zUnix . It can do all the scheduling you want WAY more easily than trying the
JES2 automatic commands.
Jerry Whitteridge
Design Engineer
Safeway Inc.
925 951 4184
If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.
>>> On 10/4/2011 at 03:19 AM, Sheldon Davis wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone have a method of comparing x86 Linux vs IFL Linux? (Performance
> and cost)
Interesting question coming from someone at Isracard. Mike Shorkend has given
a number of presentations at SHARE about Isracard's experiences ru
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
> Yes, but could you enter macro invocations in the prefix area, or only
> predefined line commands? XEDIT had prefix macros and a SET PENDING
> command so that a prefix macro could insert macro invocations into the
> prefix areas, to
Radoslaw,
What should have been asked is Why.
Unless you are writing a performance monitor (again why) there is no likely
reason as to why they need to know.
There are a lot of people that think they need to know this type of info,
especially application types who think they should programicall
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:17:40 +0200, Howard Evans wrote:
>I am trying to schedule a task to be run at 3 specific times of the day, every
>day ...
>
crontab; comes with z/OS; nothing to download or install plus an MGCR
interface; RYO. JES2/JES3 agnostic.
-- gil
---
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
> That worked on more than the 3270 family; it also worked on the
> console[1] of the 360/168.
>
> [1] Compatible with nonthing except the consoles of the 360/85 and
> 370/165.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011m.html#30 CMS loa
On 10/4/2011 4:57 PM, R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2011-10-04 16:06, Miklos Szigetvari pisze:
Hi
Would like to see the CPU utilization /CPU engine.
Any simple way to get this ?
IMHO quick and simple way is to use HMC.
Hi
I would need in a program
W dniu 2011-10-04 16:32, Hal Merritt pisze:
IMHO, the DS8000 family of machines is awesome. You're gonna love it.
The DS8000 family is powerful, and that means that there is a learning curve.
Hit IBM or the business partner for conversion services to be included with the
price. With the right
W dniu 2011-10-04 16:06, Miklos Szigetvari pisze:
Hi
Would like to see the CPU utilization /CPU engine.
Any simple way to get this ?
IMHO quick and simple way is to use HMC.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku
przeznacz
That's because you issued the $TA commands for a time "earlier" than the
current time. WAD according to the JES2 Commands manual. Add 24 hours to your
T= time and it will execute immediately and then at the scheduled time you
expect.
/*$ T A0015,T=34.00,I=86400,'$VS,''S SENDSMF'''
/*$ T A0016,T=
Another one is Alex, at http://www.sscmainframe.com/freeware.htm
Freeware. Doc is at http://www.sscmainframe.com/alexcmds.htm
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu w
You can also check out the AUTO program on CBT file 098.
Al Staller | Z Systems Programmer | KBM Group | (Tel) 972 664 3565 |
allan.stal...@kbmg.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Howard Evans
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2
Have you issued '$SA,ALL'?
My sequence is:
Initialize JES
Issue $SA,ALL
$TA,,T=TIME(+24 hrs),command.
BTW, The commands shown will issue the command *ONE* TIME. You will need
to add an I= to repeat the commands.
My commands are members of a parmlib and include a step to re-instate
the automat
Java 7.0 is announced/available today.
The Java 64-bit prereq page still in error; correct z/OS 1.11 PTF is UA16880
per Gadi's post.
I opened another PMR as apparently Gadi's went nowhere.
By the way, is PFT is a new acronym "Per Focum Transitum?" (Forgive my
vocabulary, declensions & conjugatio
Download Dave Cole's Scheduler from the Cole Software website. It's free and
works well.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
I use the following to schedule daily commands, etc.
ftp://libraries.naspa.com/techsupt/Miller0899.txt
Really simple.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Howard Evans
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 9:18 AM
To: IBM
Howard,
The way we do this is we just set the items to run at the appointed time once,
ie take the I=86400 off the command. Each night at midnight we cancel all the
auto commands and then re-establish them. Here is the JCL called "J" that is
used to submit the AUTOCMDS member of a private lib
IMHO, the DS8000 family of machines is awesome. You're gonna love it.
The DS8000 family is powerful, and that means that there is a learning curve.
Hit IBM or the business partner for conversion services to be included with the
price. With the right tools in experienced hands, the conversion ca
I am trying to schedule a task to be run at 3 specific times of the day, every
day using the JES2 automatic command facility and am not having much luck.
I have added the following commands to JES2 startup:
/*$ T A0015,T=10.00,I=86400,'$VS,''S SENDSMF'''
/*$ T A0016,T=12.00,I=86400,'$VS,''S SENDS
Hi
Would like to see the CPU utilization /CPU engine.
Any simple way to get this ?
We use currently the RMCT and CCT (RM CPU Management Control Table) to
get CPU utilization quickly.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / ar
There have been several published studies showing that using a
zero-based comparison, the z/Linux solution is cheaper.
Check the archives. At least one person has stated this formally and
offered his analysis to others.
Unfortunately, I have misplaced my copy and can't tell you where the
"break ev
Jan,
We migrated from EMC Symmetrix with 8 Escon channels to a DS6800 with 2 Ficon
channels. Performance is way better than I expected. And I second the vote
for FDRPAS. It worked so well, I was unsure that it actually did anything, but
it worked exactly as they advertise. You can control y
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:25:19 -0600, Mark Post wrote:
>As always, makes me wonder what else they got wrong.
Like this:
IBM measures use of its mainframe systems in millions of instructions per
second (MIPS).
--
Tom Marchant
-
In <9744671434806595.wa.sdavisisracard.co...@alabamamaps.ua.edu>, on
10/04/2011
at 02:19 AM, Sheldon Davis said:
>Does anyone have a method of comparing x86 Linux vs IFL Linux?
>(Performance and cost)
First define your workload; the results will vary depending on whether
you are CPU bound or
I believe the problem is not with Linux kernel itself, but what you run
under...
ITschak
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Sheldon Davis wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone have a method of comparing x86 Linux vs IFL Linux? (Performance
> and cost)
>
> Thanks
>
> Sheldon Davis
>
> ---
In , on 10/02/2011
at 04:20 PM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler said:
>what i remember was that in the above "typical screen layout" ...
>was that prefix area was standard EDGAR feature
Yes, but could you enter macro invocations in the prefix area, or only
predefined line commands? XEDIT had prefix macr
In <1317597476.40615.yahoomail...@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>, on
10/02/2011
at 04:17 PM, Scott Ford said:
>Yeah, but I am so cross-platformed, sometimes my old memory cells has
>to remember which ..lol
Or cross released. Sometimes I try to use a feature that isn't there
yet. "Oh, yeah, they
In , on 10/01/2011
at 09:53 PM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler said:
>move to vm370/cms and 3270 ... the standard cms editor was updated to
>display a fullscreen of the file
That worked on more than the 3270 family; it also worked on the
console[1] of the 360/168.
[1] Compatible with nonthing except th
Hi
Does anyone have a method of comparing x86 Linux vs IFL Linux? (Performance and
cost)
Thanks
Sheldon Davis
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the messa
47 matches
Mail list logo
