W dniu 2012-04-27 07:38, Edward Jaffe pisze:
On 4/26/2012 9:09 PM, Scott McFall wrote:
MAINFRAME SKILLS ARE BECOMING SCARCE!particularly Systems
Programmers.
I hear this paradoxical conjecture all the time.
If true, why are so many skilled mainframe professionals -- particularly
sysprogs
On 4/26/2012 9:09 PM, Scott McFall wrote:
MAINFRAME SKILLS ARE BECOMING SCARCE!particularly Systems Programmers.
I hear this paradoxical conjecture all the time.
If true, why are so many skilled mainframe professionals -- particularly
sysprogs -- looking for work? IJS...
--
Edward E Jaf
MAINFRAME SKILLS ARE BECOMING SCARCE!particularly Systems Programmers.
We just wanted to let you know the following mainframe & CA automation
product classes are coming up both in our live Virtual Classroom, Pittsburgh
and Toronto training centers.
Attend either in-person (Pittsburgh/To
Lot of ways to crack this one, FTP like everyone stated. Jes2 to jes2 using
TCPIP, using NJE,
TSO Xmit works great
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Apr 26, 2012, at 7:44 PM, John McKown wrote:
> The SENDSITE command will help if the PDS needs to be created.
>
for text files the mput * should work even with the "sqatties" in the way.
for the binaries... not so sure. But the mvs to mvs with ebcdic and mode b
is how I have transferred load modules to remote sites. Works great!
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group
On Thu, Apr 26, 201
The SENDSITE command will help if the PDS needs to be created.
On Apr 26, 2012 6:41 PM, "retired mainframer"
wrote:
> If you specify EBCDIC and BLOCK and if the receiving PDS is already
> allocated, it will even transfer load modules and preserve the directory
> information. I think it will als
If you specify EBCDIC and BLOCK and if the receiving PDS is already
allocated, it will even transfer load modules and preserve the directory
information. I think it will also preserve ISPF statistics.
lcd local_pds
cd remote_pds
ebcdic
block
mget * (or mput if you are on the transmit system)
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:09:27 -0400, Rob Schramm wrote:
>Yep.
>
>lcd 'local pdsname'
>cd 'foreign pdsname'
>
>MPUT *
>
>will do it just fine.
>
The tricky part may be allocating the receiving PDS. Notice that
the statement of the problem said it had to be done "using FTP".
It's easily enough done
If you have a VM or VM-related tool or document that you'd like to publish to
the VM community, please go to http://www.vmworkshop.org/tools/submit-a-tool
and fill in the information there. It will be published to vmworkshop.org ASAP.
---
On 2012-04-24 23:36, Edward Jaffe wrote:
The "march" toward a personal use z/OS license takes another step forward ...
http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/5/897/ENUS212-145/ENUS212-145.PDF
"... Additionally, the [Rational Developer and Test Environment for System z]
product can now be purchase
You left out some key information from the first two lines of the IEHLIST
output.
Your previous (and subsequent) ISPF data states that 12 extents are
allocated. This IEHLIST output shows only 3 with tracks. It then shows 9
additional extents with no tracks. That explains the 12 extents but
Exactly. Could not be more straightforward.
Exactly the same as copying the contents of a folder from one UNIX or
Windows machine to another.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Rob Schramm
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 20
z/OS to z/OS, the z/OS extension MGET should work :) It's when you
park/pass-through the squatty box that it gets more picky.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu]
On 4/26/2012 2:32 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
The backup is essential if IBM's help is to be solicited. I would ask
for that help before doing anything more. I have never seen or heard
of such an error, and it may be hard to reproduce.
And, I recommend DUMP TRACKS. Do NOT use any sort of logical
Yep.
lcd 'local pdsname'
cd 'foreign pdsname'
MPUT *
will do it just fine.
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:02 PM, John Norgauer
wrote:
> FTP a PDS from one Mainframe to another mainframe connected through TCPIP?
>
> If so how is it done?
>
>
>
>
>
>FTP a PDS from one Mainframe to another mainframe connected through TCPIP?
>
>If so how is it done?
>
>
>
>John Norgauer
I typically either use TRSMAIN, TSO XMIT, or DFDSS to dump the PDS to a seq
file, then do the FTP.
I think TRSMAIN can actually have the PDS as input and produce the seq fi
This is a good point. I wonder what brought this DSN to Esmie's attention?
Is it usable by the application it is part of?
I would wager if it doesn't migrate/recall, it also won't backup/recover
usefully either.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
> -Ori
FTP a PDS from one Mainframe to another mainframe connected through TCPIP?
If so how is it done?
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PRO
What command, what ISPF panel is invoked here?
What libraries do these commands come from?
Might this be a panel issue ... truncated / overflowed numeric field in
"Allocated tracks" because the panel is a customized (home-grown) panel from
many years ago?
Regards,
Ulrich Krueger
-
> Here i
The backup is essential if IBM's help is to be solicited. I would ask
for that help before doing anything more. I have never seen or heard
of such an error, and it may be hard to reproduce.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
---
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:48:48 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>Migrate/recall it and it might get better.
I wouldn't do that without first taking a full volume backup.
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive ac
What level of z/OS? I vaguely remember when ISPF hadn't caught up with newer PS
formats.
Migrate/recall it and it might get better.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama
Being able to reproduce the incorrect display long after any DSCBs were being
updated indicates that this is not due to a timing problem when reading the
DSCBs. I suggest you get IBM involved, either through an ETR or an APAR.
Bill Fairchild
Programmer
Rocket Software
408 Chamberlain Park Lane
Here is the display after I hit ENTER
Data Set Information
Command
===>
Data Set Nam
Once the dsn is displayed by ISPF, I then typed I as shown below:
Command - Enter "/" to select
action Message
Volume
---
IZWA6
Better yet, recreate the steps you took but do not hit enter. When you have
finished typing "I beside the dsn", then copy the screen image before you hit
enter. Insert your screen image into your next post.
Bill Fairchild
Programmer
Rocket Software
408 Chamberlain Park Lane . Franklin, TN 3706
Please describe more precisely what you did when you said you "typed I beside
the dsn".
I tried to type the number 1 and the letter I beside a dsn on an ISPF 3.4
screen and I did not get any display like yours.
Bill Fairchild
Programmer
Rocket Software
408 Chamberlain Park Lane . Franklin, TN 37
Bill,
In my first e-mail, I displayed the dsn the following way:
ISPF 3.4
ZWA6PWG.ICOD.DMSC.D2012087.T130018
Next, I typed I besided the dsn
Then it displayed me the dsn stats.
From: Bill Fairchild
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 201
The display you show below only displays the first 3 extents, which have a
total of 3*1074=3222 tracks, which is what your previous email said was the
total of all tracks allocated. This display also shows a non-zero pointer to a
F3 DSCB in which will be described up to 13 more extents of which
Hi Tom,
I ran the IEHLIST with FORMAT option and this is what it tells me:
SMS.NPE LRECL KEYLEN INITIAL ALLOC 2ND ALLOC EXTEND LAST
BLK(T-R-L) DIR.REM F2 OR F3(C-H-R)
DSCB(C-H-
Listing says there are 12 extents of 1074 tracks each, which totals 12,888
tracks.
12,888 tracks is more than the reported 12,596 tracks used.
The allocated tracks could be wrong due to a bug.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:24:10 -0700, esmie moo wrote:
>Good Morning Gentle Readers,
>The dsn has the following allcation but I am not sure how to
>correct the problem. I have never seen before where the
>current utilization is larger than the allocation.
I've never seen that either. Before
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
The dsn has the following allcation but I am not sure how to correct the
problem. I have never seen before where the current utilization is larger
than the allocation.
General Data Current
Allocation
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
> This is a case where I prefer the Burroughs notation; they called the
> equivalent flag the presence bit, which is more neutral.
page transfers/io is done with channel programs which have real
addresses.
virtual memory has segment
The finding that fewer explicit GOTOs are used and need be used in
writing a routine in a statement-level language that makes the
standard structured-programming figures available is at once trivial
and important.
As I noted in an earlier post I tend to use GOTOs chiefly in recursive
processing, w
In , on 04/26/2012
at 09:01 AM, Binyamin Dissen said:
>Its invalid because its invalid. Got it. Thanks.
This is a case where I prefer the Burroughs notation; they called the
equivalent flag the presence bit, which is more neutral.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In <5616521949719829.wa.m42tomibmmainyahoo@bama.ua.edu>, on
04/26/2012
at 07:10 AM, Tom Marchant said:
>The state information that is stored in SMPTABL is not the state of
>SYSMODs. It is the state of the Sysmod Management dialog.
I understand that; it is precisely the reason that I don
In <4f959964.2060...@phoenixsoftware.com>, on 04/23/2012
at 11:03 AM, Edward Jaffe said:
>http://proceedings.share.org/client_files/SHARE_in_San_Jose/S8133EJ131525.pdf
A few comments:
1. Most of the macro instructions the paper mentions come with
the HLA toolkit. I'm not sure how they c
Thanks John...
*
*
*George Rodriguez*
*Specialist II - IT Solutions*
*Application Support / Quality Assurance*
*PX - 47652*
*(561) 357-7652 (office)*
*(561) 707-3496 (mobile)*
*School District of Palm Beach County*
*3348 Forest Hill Blvd.*
*Room B-251*
*West Palm Beach, FL. 33406-5869*
*Florida's O
ALTER cluster NULLIFY(RETENTION)
per
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2I290/5.2.2
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarket
Is there a way of removing the TO(***PERM***) option of a cluster without
actually putting an expiration date?
Thanks in advance...
*
*
*George Rodriguez*
*Specialist II - IT Solutions*
*Application Support / Quality Assurance*
*PX - 47652*
*(561) 357-7652 (office)*
*(561) 707-3496 (mobile)*
*Scho
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:24:57 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>In <4f96b36c.3000...@acm.org>, on 04/24/2012
> at 09:06 AM, "Joel C. Ewing" said:
>
>>SMP/E dialogs do not work that way. Users do not share the same
>>variables directly, they share the same list of "named" maintenance
>>pro
We are a UK based Partnerworld developer and we currently use the Dallas
RDP program. We are looking at the possiblity of using a UK based hosting
service. I'm looking for the names of companies that provide this facility
under the Partnerworld umbrella.
Jim McAlpine
---
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>>Many of my users are receiving these reports via e-mail.
>There are a number of SPOOL to e-mail packages available that can transform
>data in various ways, including generating PDF attachments from SYSOUT files.
Ah yes, thanks for reminding me about those packa
-- Forwarded message --
From: Shai Hess
Date: Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: mfnetdisk - A new message was received in your Site
To: thomas.cothm...@ppi.de
Cc: shai.h...@gmail.com
**
HI,
OK, I think you right.
Three months is a little short time between activation.
45 matches
Mail list logo
