Re: COBANAL new beta version

Being inside IBM (Niederland) I have no access to production code to help out but I could use your expert advice. I am looking at a project that will require the mapping of PLI load modules. I am searching for long lost CSECTs of a sunsetted product. Any tips on dissecting LMODs? Danke vielm

Re: Question about SVC 109

Sorry I'm late to the game, folks! File CBT531 contains a Rexx, SVCSRCH, that displays the first 160 bytes in hex for any/all SVCs. When it encounters an ESR SVC in also displays the table. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / a

Re: Have you ever abended IDCAMS?

Could the modal commands (IF-THE-ELSE; DO-END; SET MAXCC/LASTCC; CANCEL) be of any use? IIRC the max CC from IDCAMS is 16. Testing the RC in the JCL for some strange value (an odd integer?) could then bypass steps of flush the JOB. --

Re: What can you do on the PC that is like M/F Sysmgt

http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/pnppwr/wmi/default.mspx -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://ba

Re: What can you do on the PC that is like M/F Sysmgt

The APIs are there. Were you expecting an OOTB MIB-II agent application? Ooo! A product idea, perhaps? Uhh, too many non-critical PCs for a Unicenter or Tivoli to manage, one would think. A mid-tier aggregation is probably called for. --

CIBDATLN (how big is BIG?)

What is the maximum size of a z/OS console input message? Stated another way, how large a number can be in CIBDATLN? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the mess

Re: IEFUSI and ELIM

What does SMFPRMxx look like? Is the USI specified for SUBSYS(STC,...)? The 'OOBE' is not to have the USI driven for STCs. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with th

Cell pool traversal and IGVxxx macros

CPOOLing is great to get 'stuff' into fixed length buffers. How about the retrieval operation? 'Data Areas' maps the PXT and PPD with VSM (IGV-prefixed) macros. But even the cell pool callable services (CSRx) do not have a mechanism AFAICS. 1. Where do the macros reside? Surely not SYS1.PVTMA

Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

Had the recent opportunity to code some dual-mode (CICS & batch) assembler. After searching the LISTSERVs the DFHAFCD macro (.SDFHMACS) revealed itself. The code did not contained CICS EXEC statements and therefore did not require preprocessing. Upon entry under CICS the registers point into La-la

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

Au contraire, the DFHEAI stub is *required* to be the first CSECT in the module. CICS 'interrogates' modules for it's I-catcher to determine if it is command level or not. Use the linkage editor NAME statement to point to your favourite entry point (omitted, admittedly but we're all adults here).

Re: Cell pool traversal and IGVxxx macros

Arrgh! There is a system-maintained map in the SPD so any other tree structure is redundant. And with a bit of RR math one gets the pointer array details. Just looking for a leg-up here. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arc

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

>> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro >> >> Had the recent opportunity to code some dual-mode (CICS & batch) assembler. >> After searching the LISTSERVs the DFHAFCD macro (.SDFHMACS) revealed itself. The c

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 07:40:58 -0500, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro >> >> [ snip ] >> >> If CICS (KCP, which would make the assembler code "main&qu

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:50:44 -0500, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro >> >> [ snip ] >> >> -- -- --- >>

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 06:47:33 -0500, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro >> >> [ snip ] >> >> No magic involved. The 'stump' is passed contro