nter is set to
ASCII and you are sending EBCDIC.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Henke, George wrote:
> Having compatibility issues. Print is corrupted.
>
> Any ideas?
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Range
Having compatibility issues. Print is corrupted.
Any ideas?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Does the IBM 7720/7740 copy just the blocks that have changed or all the data
for offsite backup?
Have to transmit 9 TB compressed data nightly in 18 hours offsite to DR using
a IBM 7720/7740 hybrid.
Trying to estimate how long it would take on a 1 Gbps and a 10 Gbps pipe or
OC-36 or OC-48.
the negotiation has completed, the encryption will start using some
sort of symmetric ... which the freebie will help out with performance.
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Henke, George wrote:
> tyvm, Tom
>
> When you say crypto hardware is not
o be capable is not always possible.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: "Henke, George"
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 02/07/2012 14:32
Subject:TLS, AT-TLS, Encryption Requirements
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discu
Has anyone done this?
Besides coding TTLS in the TCPCONFIG statement in the TCPIP PROFILE does
anything else, like enabling encryption cards, need to be done?
Also, is TLS downward compatible with older TN3270 emulators, like PROCOMM?
du
Subject: Re: ACF2/RACF User Appliation Logical Access
In
<04b3da7b71b3ab408ca62ba6046bcf8f23d722c...@gvw0676exc.americas.hpqcorp.net>,
on 01/12/2012
at 03:02 AM, "Henke, George" said:
>What we have since discovered is that the ACF2/NETMENU Session
>process has a sid
orp.net>,
on 01/06/2012
at 07:34 PM, "Henke, George" said:
>I suspect this may be generating a separate SAF call for each
>application for each user and there are 1000's of users, whereas ACF2
>may be *wildcarding* it.
Whether ACF2 is wildcarding it has nothing to do w
AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ACF2/RACF User Appliation Logical Access
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Henke, George
>
> Does anyone know how ACF2 validates a users access to specific
applications?
>
> Recently we tried
Does anyone know how best to identify Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
workloads (XML) that are processing on the MF using GPPs.
Being eligible for zIIP zAAP, they are good candidates for offloading.
I just don't know a good way to identify them on an existing mainframe.
Maybe SMF, RMF, Enc
Does anyone know how ACF2 validates a users access to specific applications?
Recently we tried to migrate from ACF2 to RACF and were forced to fallback
because ACF2 was somehow *wildcarding* a user's access to applications whereas
RACF was iterating through a list of applications.
The resulting
Offloading VTAPE to zIIP would not be so bad, no?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
R.S.
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 5:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Tapeless Solutions
W dniu 2011-12-19 23:02, Henke
bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 4:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Tapeless Solutions
"Henke, George" wrote in message
news:<04b3da7b71b3ab408ca62ba6046bcf8f23d485b...@gvw0676exc.americas.hpq
corp.net>...
> Do
Does the DS8800 do tape management (CA-1)? I don't think so.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 4:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Tapeless Solutions
&
Does anyone know of an IBM completely tapeless solution and what it might cost?
I have heard of the TS7740, but it holds only 6 TB per draw.
We have 750 TB on tape.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruct
tyvm, Barbara, nice point. I never knew VSM would go *below* when it exhausted
*above*. Others are wading through the dump now. But I will check out the
info APAR and relay your advice.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
LSQA?
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 18:31:29 +0000, Henke, George wrote:
>Getting this on a home grown session manager. It shows
>9.7 M out of 10 M allocated below and 90 M above. We have
>an IEFUSI installed. I suspect the problem is below the line
>since the session manager normally uses u
Getting this on a home grown session manager. It shows 9.7 M out of 10 M
allocated below and 90 M above. We have an IEFUSI installed. I suspect the
problem is below the line since the session manager normally uses under 2 M.
Some are speculating it LSQA is the problem, but if that were the ca
Windows MQ cannot connect to MQ on z/OS.
I don't think so.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Timothy Sipples
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 1:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: MQ alternatives
WebSphere MQ is also
I posted this yesterday, but as yet no response.
So I guess no one here has done this yet.
Is there a CICS forum where I should post this instead?
From: Henke, George
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 11:03 AM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: MQ CICS 3270 Bridge - Does it
If so, how well.
Does anyone have any experience implementing this feature particularly the
"data vector" facility instead of "screen scraping".
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to li
SMF data can now be sent to LOGSTREAM datasets thus removing the 32K VSAM
dataset limit and reducing the frequency of switching SMF Datasets.
Has anyone done this?
If so, what has been your experience?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Correct just ML2 tapes. Backup is not done.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Henke, George
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 2:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: HSM/CA1 Tape Catalog Discrepancy
Just DFHSM Backup
Just DFHSM Backup and Dump tapes.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 2:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: HSM/CA1 Tape Catalog Discrepancy
>
>HSM catalog does not agre
HSM catalog does not agree with tapes cataloged in CA1? We are noticing a
discrepancy of 200 TB.
Is this normal?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the mes
.
-Original Message-
From: Campbell Jay [mailto:james.l.campb...@irs.gov]
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:33 AM
To: Henke, George
Subject: FW: Freeing VTS Stacked Tapes
Are you referring to running out of backend tapes ?
Do you have many virtuals that are scratch ?
I just had a similar problem.
I
We are running low on scratch tapes. We can free up some SMF dailies but they
are on stacked tapes. Any ideas on how to free up whole tapes when they are
stacked.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructio
27 matches
Mail list logo
