Re: IEC507d

2007-11-14 Thread Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
Thank you all very much on this, we are looking into this to see what we can do. Aldridge Murrell -Original Message- From: Russell Witt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:04 PM To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List' Cc: Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/

Re: IEC507d

2007-11-13 Thread Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
13, 2007 11:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC507d I would look at your MPF list to see if there is any automation for this message. Lizette -Original Message- >From: "Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Nov 13, 2007

IEC507d

2007-11-13 Thread Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
We have been getting this message IEC507D and apparently DFSMSHSM has been replying "U" to the message. Is there any way to stop this and where is it coming from?? Any input would be appreciated. Thank you. Aldridge Murrell --

Re: How are you handling high SMF record volume?

2007-03-01 Thread Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
One thing that we do is dump the days data first, then run a job later to split records for various functions. Aldridge Murrell -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 8:48 AM To: IBM-MA