Finding Aliases? Symbolic Aliases?

Nobody answered so I'll jump in: Gil wrote: I'm considering, as an alternative to compress, a tactic of copy/rename/ DEFINE ALIAS. ... Experiment shows that when I do the rename; create new version; DEFINE ALIAS; their aliases continue to refer to the obsolete content by its new name rather

IBMMAIN Strategy KnowledgeBase

Hi again, just needed some time to sort posts to the original thread (news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]): My first impression is, that Wiki's are well known by some listers and are highly accepted by them. Special thanks to (in alphabetical order, I love movies :-): Ian Metcalfe, Jantje and Rob

IBMMAIN Strategy Develoment

Well, gentle listers, I've learned some of the lessons. YES, our BUILD process is quite different and cruical to sucess. But this is a chicken-and egg discussion. If we do need BUILD-Support we HAVE to participate and create it. No matter what it is based on (SCLM, SMP/E etc) WSED is too

the standalone CF vs ICF debate

Jan wrote: In this kind of discussions, you have believers and non-believers (whatever arguments are advanced by the other clan), it's like a religious war. I have 3 questions. Q1. Are you a sysplex-er which went the ICF-only way (by applying (more than probably) System- or User-Managed

IBMMAIN Strategy Base

- and this might be not trivial because of several early design desicions but should be a no-brainer for professionals OK, 'nough said, to start a fair and open discussion. PLEASE take this subject for flame and stay away in the other threads. Kind regards Peter Pfaffner

Wouldn't it be WIKI and SourceForge time?

Hi all gentle listers, I'm a MVS/OS390/zOS professional for many years (oops more than 25, but STILL under 50 ;-). One thing that bothers me for at least 2-3 years, following many discussions about the future of the MVS-Platform, is the slow adoption rate to new technologies for OUR use. If we

Wouldn't it be WIKI and SourceForge time?

First of all, sorry for the double post. The first one I posted short before midnight and didn't see it in the morning. I didn't wear my eyeglasses or whatever happened. Sorry for that. But know back to subject: I did expect some harsh criticism/responses and I'm not sure about my official

FICON Express2

Salah Balboul wrote: How can you tell if the FICON Express2 is operating at 2Gbit/Sec speed? They are connected to a 2105 device type. Nobody answered, so I jump in :-) AFAIK FiconE2 is compatible with equal/slower speeds of other Ficon-Adapters because it uses auto negotiation for speed. So

MVS - Cobol-Java Out of Memory Issue

SK wrote: But even without the using the NewStringPlatform JNI call, the code runs out of memory in the manner as mentioned earlier. I had tried to find some kind of information related to this but in vain. Well, like USS stuff Java integration is not documented very well :-) AFAIK it is

Wouldn't it be WIKI and SourceForge time?

Hi all gentle listers, I'm a MVS/OS390/zOS professional for many years (oops more than 25, but STILL under 50 ;-). One thing that bothers me for at least 2-3 years following many discussions about the future of the MVS-Platform (I hate marketing bull..it) is the slow adoption rate to new

Re: Newbie doubt about Supervised State

Roland wrote: Same apply to Cobol but also require an assembler prog to issue the MODESET. We have one to create system name token. Hi Hacker ;-), don't try to teach newbies the wrong things !!! It's really dangerous what you are doing, especially if they (the newbies) don't know the things

RSVNONR again

Radoslaw wrote (partially quoted): As I understood the manual, the address space is marked as unusable not to the end of life, but until all other address apces which co-operated with my a/s are ended. Am I right ? Well Radoslaw, AFAIK quite close, but far more complex. Please let me try to

RSVNONR -DB2

Hi all, I tried to read and understand everything posted ;-) But there is only one baseline. Do not recycle DB2 unnecessarily There's no need to do so. If SAP/Peoplesofr and some other really tough applications are happy, you're applications should confirm. If not, they're worse, and

CSRCTABL pointed by ECVTCTBL

Roland wrote: I would report usage in SHOWzOS but don't know which slot is assigned to whom.. Hi Roland, unfortunatly no chance :-( AFAIK there is no public repository (There may be an internal vendors-only one). But good vendor code uses eye catchers. May be you could print the first 16/32

Sysplex X RACF

Rosangela wrote: Can I have one sysplex in two machines with any Lparts at in more than one place, but the Lpars machine 1 not look machine 2, but same racf using the sysplex; or I need will do installation of RRSF? Rosangela, I really tried hard to figure out your question but I'm not sure