/etc and /var mounted as DIR not SYML

2011-06-28 Thread Randy Hoekstra
I am installing 1.11 and somehow have managed to get both /etc and /var mounted as directories and no symbolic links: /SYSTEM/etc mountpoint = / on OMVS.Z1B.ROOT (empty) /etc/ mountpoint = /etc on OMVS.Z1B.ETC /var/ mountpoint = /var on OMVS.Z1B.VAR Based on my 1.9 system, the mounts should be

Re: /etc and /var mounted as DIR not SYML

2011-06-29 Thread Randy Hoekstra
I now have the /etc and /var directories mounted correctly, but am still getting the "The symlink defined by /etc [/var] already exists as a different file type." error. This is not a SYSPLEX, it is a single system. Ideas anyone?

Re: /etc and /var mounted as DIR not SYML RESOLVED

2011-06-29 Thread Randy Hoekstra
Resolved by uisng the UNIX ln command instead of the REXX EXEC. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http:

SHOWMVS and DFSORT 1.10 ICEPRMxx

2011-07-13 Thread Randy Hoekstra
Going from z/OS 1.9 to 1.11 and using SHOWMVS to check some options. We implemented the new with z/OS 1.10 PARMLIB support for DFSORT installtion defaults (ICEPRMxx). Has anyone else noticed that SHOWMVS appears to be picking up the IBM DFSORT defaults, perhaps expecting the linked options modul

Re: SHOWMVS and DFSORT 1.10 ICEPRMxx

2011-07-14 Thread Randy Hoekstra
ICETOOL "DEFAULTS" provided the confirmation I needed. We were just confused by the SHOWMVS DFSORT information. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the messag

Co: Z Toolkit for z/OS Install

2011-08-10 Thread Randy Hoekstra
I'm trying to install the Co: Z Toolkit for z/OS under TSO OMVS and can't get around the "FSUM9225 no memory: EDC5132I NOT ENOUGH MEMORY." errors with a TSO region size of 2047M. Our test system CSA = 2404K, ECSA = 61588K. Any suggestions? ---

RMDS Secured Reports with Top Secret

2010-05-25 Thread Randy Hoekstra
[Also posted to RACF-L] I'm looking for RMDS users that have secured reports using CA TopSecret. The RMDS documentation refers specifically to RACF rather than "security subsystem" or SAF. We have figured out how to secure the report but not how to provide selective access. ---