code zero. If you
want production to have everything it can get and hold the test to 2 MSUs 4
hour rolling, define PRODLPAR with the 800 weight only and the TESTLPAR with
200 weight and defined capacity of 2.
zSeries Sysprog
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Vinson Lee v...@sdccd.edu wrote:
We
We have a Z9 BC with one CPU and recently went back to hard capping from
Group Capacity because our production system started to suffer when WLM
started to enforce the MSU limit after 4 hours on a peak day.
Before Group Capacity, the production system had no problem handling the peak
load and was
Hi All,
Just had a few questions regarding how other people are managing ServerPacs.
How can you apply 2 different configurations to the same installation order.
For z/OS, our Test and Production LPARs have slightly different
configurations. We have separate spool, checkpoint, page, catalog
That's exactly what I needed. Thank you very much for the helpful tips and
quick response Dave!
Vince
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Dave Salt
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 8:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re:
] On Behalf
Of Vinson Lee
Sent: 14 May 2009 21:51
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Display Panel After TBDISPL Causes Next TBDISPL to Read Same Record
in REXX Exec
I'm trying to use the HSMLIST Rexx exec that Frank Clarke created but have
found a problem when selecting multiple Backup entries
I'm trying to issue an error message when displaying an ISPF panel in a Rexx
exec but the panel comes up without the error message. Here is the Rexx
code:
errfnd = 'Y'
DISPLAY PANEL(HLVERF)
Here is the INIT section of the panel:
)INIT
I'm trying to use the HSMLIST Rexx exec that Frank Clarke created but have
found a problem when selecting multiple Backup entries for Recovery. Here is
the logic:
TBDISPL tab PANEL(HLDETL)
DISPLAY Panel(X)
TBDISPL tab
The second TBDISPL is supposed to read the next entry in the table but does
The query shows there is only 1 active backup task. We think we've figured
out what is happening. We have INUSE(RETRY(Y) DELAY(0) SERIALIZATION
(PREFERRED) coded so HSM was allocating a second drive to back up datasets
that were in use after the initial backup task completed.
The other
Unfortunately, we're still running z/OS 1.7, so IBM will not allow us to open
a PMR for this issue. We are a small shop and do not have a lot of tape
drives available and are trying to minimize the number of tape drives in use
at a time. Two backup tasks are started even though we specify
?
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Vinson Lee [v...@sdccd.edu]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DFHSM MAXBACKUPTASKS(1) using 2 drives
We're getting ready to implement HSM and wanted to verify whether the Recycle
process will automatically create duplex copies of each tape if Duplex is set
to Yes for both Backup and Migration tapes. If so, will HSM also free up the
offsite volumes so they can be reused? We're using CA-1 and
is also
scratched.
Do you have CA-1 set up with an EDM statement for HSM?
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Vinson Lee [v...@sdccd.edu]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 1:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN
When checking the PSP bucket for recommended maintenance, is one supposed to
skip a Hiper fix if there is an Error Hold on it?
Thanks.
Vince
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
I updated our ACS routines to assign a specific storage group to a specific
dataset naming convention but it only works with JCL and not when allocating
through ISPF 3.2.
Anyone have any thoughts on what I may be missing?
Thanks.
Vince
-
From: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 11:33 AM
To: Vinson Lee
Cc: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: RE: ACS Routine works for JCL but not in ISPF 3.2
-Original Message-
From: Vinson Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02
and your storage group routine could be assigning based on the storage
class.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on
01/02/2007 02:32:58 PM:
-Original Message-
From: Vinson Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 1:25 PM
To: 'IBM
16 matches
Mail list logo
