Re: connect time in SMF TYPE-30

All of these fields are zero... -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: elapsed time for DFSORT

Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 09/20/2011 12:38:45 AM: [image removed] elapsed time for DFSORT Wang Xiaobing to: IBM-MAIN 09/20/2011 12:39 AM Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List Hi, Here

connect time in SMF TYPE-30

Hi, I check my batch job from SMF TYPE30, but confused on SMF30TCN and SMF30AIC. One jcl's SMF30TCN is 13 minutes but SMF30AIC is 9 seconds. I have reviewed the description from IBM manual z/OS MVS System Management Facilities, but still can not well understand what's the difference. I

elapsed time for DFSORT

Hi, Here we have a performance problem on DFSORT. The same DFSORT job run on different day have different elapsed time, the data processed is almost same. Form the job log, we find the different is the longer job show DFSORT COULD NOT DYNAMICALLY ALLOCATE THE OPTIMAL WORK DATA SET SPACE, but

Re: Real Storage Occupancy

Ted, I am worried about if the real storage used more and more it will cause paging issue..is it right ? thanks. Wang Xiaobing. On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 21:16:04 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote: I find the problem is only real storage is increasing, virtual storage looks ok..can

Re: Real Storage Occupancy

Thanks, TED and Kees.. The system is no paging..but I would like to know the reason. The Virtual Storage usage of the task - JCSOL is no increasing during the days.. Do you think it is normal ? thanks. Wang Xiaobing On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:59:45 +0200, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno

Re: Real Storage Occupancy

On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:54:44 -0500, Dale R. Smith dale- sm...@columbus.rr.com wrote: On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:22:24 -0500, Wang Xiaobing wang...@bayss.com wrote: Hi, We use a rexx program invoking ISFAFD to monitor the BATCH JOB, it is a long term running address space. The name is JCSOL, but we

Re: Real Storage Occupancy

It's difficult to find the reason from the program logic...:-( Wang Xiaobing On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 23:15:04 +0800, Johnny Luo johnny.xingkui@gmail.com wrote: Virtual storage used by the task won't increase unless new GETMAIN is issued. After initial GETMAIN the working set will increase

Real Storage Occupancy

Hi, We use a rexx program invoking ISFAFD to monitor the BATCH JOB, it is a long term running address space. The name is JCSOL, but we found the REAL STORAGE occupied by JCSOL is increased, almost 6000 frames per day. Can someone provide any train of thought to investigate this problem? TIA.

OMEG monitoring after HyperSwap

Hi , Today, after a HyperSwap processing, all are looks well, but the OMEGAMON For Storage can not get the Storage Group sapce information, any one experience the same problem ? Thanks. Wang -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /

Re: OMEG monitoring after HyperSwap

Restart OMEGAMON still get nothing...:-( -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: DFRMM confusion

Maybe you can check the pack mode in the edit profile for your EDGRMM00? Best Regards! Wang Xiaobing ( 王晓兵 ) Bayshore Consulting and Service Co. Mobile: 1391-186-4622 Fax: 8610-6439-1582 MSN: bj...@163.com Skype: bbjbxd Also for grins I change the proc to use EDGRM01, which does not exist

IEC145I 413-18 error

Hello list, We use DFRMM and STK VSM,when we run DB2 IMGCOPY job to backup data to tapelib, sometime there are IEC145I errors occured as following: IEC145I 413- 18,IFG0194A,IMGCOP3,IMGCOPY,SYSCOPY1,07CA,,BACKUPP1.SIT2CBS.IMG.TS XREF.MON2314.M0930 Would you pls advise..thanks a lot.

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Luo, No any mount message... Attached pls find the job log...thanks.. 23.16.26 JOB98181 MONDAY,25 OCT 2010 23.16.26 JOB98181 IRR010I USERID BAAP033 IS ASSIGNED TO THIS JOB. 23.18.10 JOB98181 ICH70001I BAAP033 LAST ACCESS AT 23:18:04 ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2010 23.18.10

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Thanks Ted for you reply.. IEC145I 413-18 form IBM manual means: The specified data set was opened for input, but no volume serial number was specified on the DD statement. A recovery attempt request may be specified in the DCB ABEND exit routine. But the dataset is new create, the DD

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Thanks, mace. I think the IDI0078E means the IEC145I 413-18 error occured, Fault Analyzer detected the error, and then try to record it in fault history file, but no Write access allowed. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Thanks for reply.. That's what I can not understand with.. If you're just creating the dataset, why does Image Copy think it's for input? Wang Xiaobing. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Norbert, thanks. that is the reason.. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

DFRMM extract file

are GOOD files. Any clue? Wang Xiaobing Senior SP Bayshore co. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http