Is GAL a programming language? What about the old SimPC script language? Do
such things really qualify to be called "Programming" languages? I think
this comes down to what you consider is programming.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:26 PM, zMan wrote:
> FWIW, it never occurred to me that it *wasn't* a
You have got quite a few options for this. what is available depends on
whether you just want message automation or also scheduling.
You should look at the following:
TSSO (Free from CBT tape, but requires some knowledge to build)
Write MPF exits (I bet a dozen people on here would show you how)
Br
Turn on the no hardcopy bit in the message flagbytes 2
OICTXTRFB2,CTXTRNHC FORCE NO HARDCOPY
This will display it on the console but not on syslog
or
OICTXTRFB2,CTXTRDTMDELETE THE MESSAGE
This will not display on the console or on syslog
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:06
An MPF exit can be used to recognize and respond to any message, whether it
has spaces or not in the area normally considered to be a message ID. I know
this because we use an automation product called AutoMan from Exspans that
allows us to define message IDs and by placing the text in quotes, mess
I thought everyone used automated IPL procedures these days. Was P&H
sometime ago?
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
> When I worked at P&H Mining, we IPL'd every Saturday. That worked very
> well, as at 6:00 PM they shut down all of the onlines and did backups. To
> shut d
Yes I agree. We had to give up Netview and we installed AutoMan in its
place, and had to do the same kind of thing. We wrote a counter script that
counted the number of times the message was displayed for a resource and
suppressed it until the counter was triggered for that resource. It is not a
di
Hi Dana,
we had a similar problem and looked at both freeware and alternative low
cost solutions for this. In our case we have two CEC each with four LPARs.
After experimenting with TSSO our management rejected it, because we could
not afford to make a system programmer resource available to update
Watch out for problems due to VSM ALLOWUSERKEYCSA. The default changes to
NO. When you first change over set this to YES, test your system , then let
it default and see what no longer works.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / a
Our automation system relies heavily on the content of messages and has not
failed us in 10 versions of z/OS. We have an automation product that reads
the text of messages and enables the execution of tasks, depending on the
text and passing extract of text to subroutines. I have never seen a
direc
There is no jobid unless the task attaches to JES and requests one. The task
itself must request the connection and cannot be assigned from the outside.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Tommy Tsui wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I try to started a system task APPC with SUB=MSTR but can't find the
> owner/us
Is it easier to implement message flood the way IBM have implemented it or
to use one of the message automation products that offer the MPF exit as one
of its options?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Klein, Kenneth wrote:
>
>
> A
Use Matrix from Exspans.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Ward, Mike S wrote:
> Hello all, I have written an mq security exit for z/os in assembler that
> works pretty well. What I would like to add is the capability to use
> persistent memory. I tried to allocate memory from SUBPool 131 and 132
Don't know about doing it in OPS/MVS. We use AutoMan V2.9 and use the PARSE
MSG command to parse the message and determine the format.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Lizette Koehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> We had an issue with a back end tape in our VTS getting an error.
>
> CBR3750I Messa
Ted, this is basically what Brian uses this discussion group for, to
advertise his products and services.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > apologize if you have already received the email on this, but Syzygy is
> announcing our BETA testing of the next v
That is not completely true. Some intelligent schedulers also allow you to
specify the disposition of work when it is complete.
On Dec 16, 2007 10:15 AM, Kenneth E Tomiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Job schedulers merely kick off the work, so collecting the 'process'
> output is
> up to the proc
We have just started to use the SPOOL command of our automation tool
(AutoMan) to send sysout by email.
On Dec 13, 2007 4:53 PM, Jon Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Similarly to Bruno, we schedule everything from z/OS, except that we use
> CA-Scheduler instead of TWS. As for the sysout, we ju
Hi Rick,
I cant point you at a reference, but I can tell you how we looked at a
problem like that some years ago. You can UNSPEC the pointers into a
variable, and display them to see where they are pointing.
On Dec 10, 2007 11:37 AM, Rick Fochtman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone point me
This is not really an appropriate forum for people threatening each
other. If you want to fight with each other you should do it in
private. If my boss here at the Ministry sees this kind of exchange,
he will order us to stop experimenting with code from CBT. He will
also black list all the three p
and
ambulances, as well as payrolls for public services.
On 10/23/07, Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 22 Oct 2007 14:12:07 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zahir Hemini)
> wrote:
>
> >This is exactly why there are products like CA OPS/MVS and Automan and
> >
This is exactly why there are products like CA OPS/MVS and Automan and
probably a few others. People sometimes are new to a procedure, they do
accidentally make mistakes, and read and write instructions incorrectly. It
is up to the systems management to make sure that proper process is in place
to
Yes. You cant do it. The one byte console ID is dropped.
On 7/16/07, Sharon Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are scheduled to migrate all our production systems to z/OS 1.8 and we
still have an open apar with NETVIEW DM with the one-byte console id. Has
this stopped anyone from migrating fo
There are a few. AutoMan is like that too.
On 5/24/07, John Mattson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know it is against "policy" to praise rather than disparage, but
occasionally a software vendor comes up with an install that really works
quite nicely. DTS www.dtssoftware.com SRS product
22 matches
Mail list logo