In , on 08/02/2010
at 08:04 AM, Paul Gilmartin said:
> READY
>allocate path('/u/me/nonesuch')
> IKJ56228I PATH /u/me/nonesuch NOT IN CATALOG OR CATALOG CAN NOT BE
>ACCESSED
That probably comes from DAIRFAIL rather than DYNALLOC. Was the PMR
against TSO/E?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
In , on 08/02/2010
at 04:15 AM, Barbara Nitz said:
>You've provided me with an excellent example for my statement above.
>Because that message is issued by TSO (IKJ prefix) or rather, by
>dynalloc which uses some DAIR interfaces into TSO.
DAIR uses DYNALLOC; DYNALLOC does not use DAIR. I sus
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 08:12:50 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>In , on 08/02/2010
> at 04:15 AM, Barbara Nitz said:
>
>>You've provided me with an excellent example for my statement above.
>>Because that message is issued by TSO (IKJ prefix) or rather, by
>>dynalloc which uses some DAIR int
>>The reason *I* hate OMVS is that those using it via some
>>C/C++/JAVA/whatever-clickable-stuff have no clue how things are
>>implemented in z/OS. So in case of an error they take any return
code/reason
>>code they get at face value. Unfortunately, that is the completely *wrong*
>>way to go abou
4 matches
Mail list logo
