On 10 Apr 2006 10:33:57 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould) wrote:
>> much snipped > >I believe in the context of the original writer that the JES exit(s) >were either complex or change was needed to accommodate the change in >JES2 levels. Some one spoke about the management issue in this and I >concur. But that doesn't get the issue resolved. I would suggest a >consultant be hired not only to change the exit but to properly >document the exit so if/when it happens again it should be easier to >change. This will not stop the problem if there is a rewrite in JES2 >that will require a exit rewrite but hopefully if its documented well >a consultant will only be briefly needed for the re-write. he best thing might be to review what the exits are doing and see which if any are still needed. A review of available freeware such as that at www.cbt.org also might be in order. In these days of HIPPA and SOX and for Canadians, PIPEDA, it behooves an organization to either know what its JES exits do and how they do it or get rid of them. > >Ed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
