Ed,
I was about to reply to the points you made and realized we have a
fundamental disagreement about the nature and tone of Timothy's posts. I
have *never* thought that his posts contained "border line" material.
Not even close.
Like Jim and Peter (and dozens of others from IBM), I believe Timot
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
I guess I am confused. *Most* of the time, we like it when IBMers post
what they know or think we should know. Is that now considered
advertising? :-(
Timothy is one of the few IBM Software Architects posting to this forum.
I, personally, have always found his posts to
Quite honestly, there is nothing free about PCI. Requirements for PCI
compliance are not free. Doesn't matter if you try to do it all yourself
or have people come in to help. There is a definite cost.
As to the class, it is just about Communication Server aspects. Seems
like a good idea.
Ed,
I'm not quite sure just what you're saying. Personally, I like most of
Timothy Sipples' posts. I'm aware that he is an IBM employee, which is
obvious from his Sig line and email address. He does bring out a viewpoint
that is often contrary to what many IBM-Main posters have. I don't alway
Ed,
I guess I am confused. *Most* of the time, we like it when IBMers post
what they know or think we should know. Is that now considered
advertising? :-(
Timothy is one of the few IBM Software Architects posting to this forum.
I, personally, have always found his posts to be informative, relevan
George Fogg wrote:
I'm confused. Is this an advertisement on IBM-MAIN?
George Fogg
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
I would say *NO*, it is not really an advertisement. It's more like a
"FOR YOUR INFORMATION".
Advertising generally expects some return on investment. Clearly stated,
"There is
6 matches
Mail list logo
