Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M

2011-05-30 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
"Mark Zelden" wrote in message news:... > On Fri, 27 May 2011 14:56:01 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: > > >On 27 May 2011 12:42, Charles Mills wrote: > >>> REGION=0K requests only one-thousandth as much as REGION=0M. > >> > >> Does SPACE=(TRK,0) allocate only 1/15 as much DASD as SPACE=(CYL,0)? > >

Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M

2011-05-27 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 27 May 2011 14:41:53 -0600, Frank Swarbrick wrote: >I prefer SPACE=(0,0) > I'd suggest SPACE=(0,(0,0,0)) to avoid allocating directory blocks and secondary extents. Being considerably whimsy challenged on Fridays, I was impelled to try this. To my minor surprise, it executes with no JCL

Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M

2011-05-27 Thread Frank Swarbrick
arles > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf > Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 4:38 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M >

Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M

2011-05-27 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 27 May 2011 14:56:01 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: >On 27 May 2011 12:42, Charles Mills wrote: >>> REGION=0K requests only one-thousandth as much as REGION=0M. >> >> Does SPACE=(TRK,0) allocate only 1/15 as much DASD as SPACE=(CYL,0)? > >Generally yes. But it could be different on older dev

Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M

2011-05-27 Thread Tony Harminc
On 27 May 2011 12:42, Charles Mills wrote: >> REGION=0K requests only one-thousandth as much as REGION=0M. > > Does SPACE=(TRK,0) allocate only 1/15 as much DASD as SPACE=(CYL,0)? Generally yes. But it could be different on older devices with a different number of tracks/cylinder. Where you *real

Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M

2011-05-27 Thread Bill Fairchild
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M > REGION=0K requests only one-thousandth as much as REGION=0M. Does SPACE=(TRK,0) allocate only 1/15 as much DASD as SPACE=(CYL,0)? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion L

Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M

2011-05-27 Thread Charles Mills
:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:24:31 +0200, Michael Klaeschen wrote: >See chapter 16.13.2 of MVS JCL Reference. IBM's explanation there does >not differ between 0K and 0M. However, I think you can

Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M

2011-05-26 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Huh? - Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca Twitter: @TedMacNEIL -Original Message- From: Paul Gilmartin Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:37:50 To: Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Subject: Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION

Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M

2011-05-26 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:24:31 +0200, Michael Klaeschen wrote: >See chapter 16.13.2 of MVS JCL Reference. IBM's explanation there does not >differ between 0K and 0M. However, I think you can intercept with a JES >exit and may be even IEALIMIT/IEFUSI. > REGION=0K requests only one-thousandth as much

Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M

2011-05-26 Thread Michael Klaeschen
See chapter 16.13.2 of MVS JCL Reference. IBM's explanation there does not differ between 0K and 0M. However, I think you can intercept with a JES exit and may be even IEALIMIT/IEFUSI. Cheers Michael Von:Alvaro Guirao Lopez An: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Datum: 2011-05-26 09:49 Betreff: