"Mark Zelden" wrote in message
news:...
> On Fri, 27 May 2011 14:56:01 -0400, Tony Harminc
wrote:
>
> >On 27 May 2011 12:42, Charles Mills wrote:
> >>> REGION=0K requests only one-thousandth as much as REGION=0M.
> >>
> >> Does SPACE=(TRK,0) allocate only 1/15 as much DASD as
SPACE=(CYL,0)?
> >
On Fri, 27 May 2011 14:41:53 -0600, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>I prefer SPACE=(0,0)
>
I'd suggest SPACE=(0,(0,0,0)) to avoid allocating directory blocks
and secondary extents.
Being considerably whimsy challenged on Fridays, I was impelled
to try this. To my minor surprise, it executes with no JCL
arles
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
> Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 4:38 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M
>
On Fri, 27 May 2011 14:56:01 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
>On 27 May 2011 12:42, Charles Mills wrote:
>>> REGION=0K requests only one-thousandth as much as REGION=0M.
>>
>> Does SPACE=(TRK,0) allocate only 1/15 as much DASD as SPACE=(CYL,0)?
>
>Generally yes. But it could be different on older dev
On 27 May 2011 12:42, Charles Mills wrote:
>> REGION=0K requests only one-thousandth as much as REGION=0M.
>
> Does SPACE=(TRK,0) allocate only 1/15 as much DASD as SPACE=(CYL,0)?
Generally yes. But it could be different on older devices with a
different number of tracks/cylinder. Where you *real
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M
> REGION=0K requests only one-thousandth as much as REGION=0M.
Does SPACE=(TRK,0) allocate only 1/15 as much DASD as SPACE=(CYL,0)?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion L
:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION=0M
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:24:31 +0200, Michael Klaeschen wrote:
>See chapter 16.13.2 of MVS JCL Reference. IBM's explanation there does
>not differ between 0K and 0M. However, I think you can
Huh?
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gilmartin
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:37:50
To:
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Antwort: Differences between REGION=0K and REGION
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:24:31 +0200, Michael Klaeschen wrote:
>See chapter 16.13.2 of MVS JCL Reference. IBM's explanation there does not
>differ between 0K and 0M. However, I think you can intercept with a JES
>exit and may be even IEALIMIT/IEFUSI.
>
REGION=0K requests only one-thousandth as much
See chapter 16.13.2 of MVS JCL Reference. IBM's explanation there does not
differ between 0K and 0M. However, I think you can intercept with a JES
exit and may be even IEALIMIT/IEFUSI.
Cheers
Michael
Von:Alvaro Guirao Lopez
An: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Datum: 2011-05-26 09:49
Betreff:
10 matches
Mail list logo