Anyone good with DFSORT? Does DFSORT have the ability to multiply offsets that are not known until that time?

2011-04-25 Thread Brian Westerman
Hi, I have a difficult request from a programmer and I'm not sure about the answer. They have a flat file which has fields that can occur multiple times within a record, and there are multiple of those fields in the same record. They want to be able to use DFSORT to overlay (some of) those field

Re: Anyone good with DFSORT? Does DFSORT have the ability to multiply offsets that are not known until that time?

2011-04-25 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Brian Westerman wrote: >They have a flat file which has fields that can occur multiple times within a record, and there are multiple of those fields in the same record. They want to be able to use DFSORT to overlay (some of) those fields with specific data, but the offsets change based on how

Re: Anyone good with DFSORT? Does DFSORT have the ability to multiply offsets that are not known until that time?

2011-04-25 Thread McKown, John
I just say "Use REXX!" and be done with it. Around here, we'd likely use EasyTrieve Plus for this sort of need. It creates fairly good modules and it can be either intepreted (actually compile-and-go) or compiled like COBOL and run like a normal batch program. I will refrain from suggesting a Pe

Re: Anyone good with DFSORT? Does DFSORT have the ability to multiply offsets that are not known until that time?

2011-04-25 Thread Joe Testa
25 Apr 2011 05:00:12 -0500 > From: brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com > Subject: Anyone good with DFSORT? Does DFSORT have the ability to multiply > offsets that are not known until that time? > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > > Hi, > > I have a difficult request from a programmer

Re: Anyone good with DFSORT? Does DFSORT have the ability to multiply offsets that are not known until that time?

2011-04-25 Thread Shane Ginnane
Why ?. >From you, I was surprised at your other (preferred ?) suggestions. I would have thought perl a natural fit. Shane ... On Mon, Apr 25th, 2011 at 10:41 PM, "McKown, John" wrote: > I will refrain from suggesting a Perl solution. ---

Re: Anyone good with DFSORT? Does DFSORT have the ability to multiply offsets that are not known until that time?

2011-04-25 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 8:40 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Anyone good with DFSORT? Does DFSORT have the > ability to multiply

Re: Anyone good with DFSORT? Does DFSORT have the ability to multiply offsets that are not known until that time?

2011-04-26 Thread Brian Westerman
The "occurrence" fields are 1 byte hex fields, and their offsets change based on what they are set to as I outlined before. The original reason we wanted to use DFSORT is the ability to change the data by passing it through a translate table (ALTSEQ). The reason we are doing this is to "obfuscate

Re: Anyone good with DFSORT? Does DFSORT have the ability to multiply offsets that are not known until that time?

2011-04-26 Thread Frank Yaeger
Brian Westerman on IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/26/2011 02:25:05 AM: > The "occurrence" fields are 1 byte hex fields, and their offsets change > based on what they are set to as I outlined before. > > I noticed that Elardaus in a previous response had said you can save into > temporar

Re: Anyone good with DFSORT? Does DFSORT have the ability to multiply offsets that are not known until that time?

2011-04-26 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Frank Yaeger and Brian Westerman wrote: >Elardaus G! A new variation of my name! ;-D My name is Elardus! Please SORT it out! ;-D Nevermind, I've forgiven you. ;-D Frank Yaeger wrote: >Well, I'd like to think I'm pretty good with DFSORT and DFSORT's ICETOOL. :-) Wow! I learned so