Back Doors (was: EXCP with a DEB)

2006-08-19 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, john gilmore said: > Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:14:20 + > > There are ways to do what you want to do. They would be APARable as z/OS > security breaches if they werje described in sufficient detail to be usable. > > The presence of bank vaults in the world means tha

Re: Back Doors (was: EXCP with a DEB)

2006-08-20 Thread John (IBM-MAIN)
-- snip -- > The presence of bank vaults in the world means that there must also be > locksmiths in it who can open them, and I suppose that there is a similar > rationale for the skills needed to breach z/OS, but this is a public forum > in which I for one do not think we should facilitate such op

Re: Back Doors (was: EXCP with a DEB)

2006-08-20 Thread Arthur T.
On 19 Aug 2006 09:37:29 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you are aware of further ways that "would be APARable", I'll suggest that it's your ethical responsibility, not to disclose them or even hint of their existence in a pubic forum

Re: Back Doors (was: EXCP with a DEB)

2006-08-20 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/19/2006 at 10:37 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >If you are aware of further ways that "would be APARable", I'll >suggest that it's your ethical responsibility, not to disclose them >or even hint of their existence in a pubic forum, but to initiate th