Re: CA-JMR question

2008-11-12 Thread John McKown
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:06:25 -0600, Dave Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >John, >I would re-read the manual, those seem pretty screwy rules, especially in this >day and age. Here are our Rlse 4.6 dataset names; > >SOFTWARE.CAJMR46.ARCH.ARC04291 106337 >SOFTWA

Re: CA-JMR question

2008-11-12 Thread Dave Cartwright
John, I would re-read the manual, those seem pretty screwy rules, especially in this day and age. Here are our Rlse 4.6 dataset names; SOFTWARE.CAJMR46.ARCH.ARC04291 106337 SOFTWARE.CAJMR46.ARCH.ARC04298 102056 SOFTWARE.CAJMR46.AR

Re: CA-JMR question

2008-11-12 Thread John McKown
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:24:49 -0600, Dave Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >John, > >Our ALTERN and MASTER datasets are indeed one track, but our HOLD file is >now up to 1095 tracks in 9 extents. > >HTH >Dave > Thanks, that does help. I've been very irritated installing this product. Some of

Re: CA-JMR question

2008-11-12 Thread Dave Cartwright
John, Our ALTERN and MASTER datasets are indeed one track, but our HOLD file is now up to 1095 tracks in 9 extents. HTH Dave -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

CA-JMR question

2008-11-11 Thread John McKown
If anybody out there is using CA-JMR to archive their job JCL type output, I have a question. I cannot find any way to determine how big the MASTER, ALTERN, and HOLD datasets should be. The example show TRK,(1,1), but that just doesn't seem to be reasonable. Any help? -- John ---