Thank you. Extract did work!
But... it but doesn't process the -REP, -INS, etc commands that programmers
also include in their SYSIN stream.
I was hoping for a solution that I could completely "bury" in the Procs and
require minimal or no changes by the programmers. Unfortunately, I don't
see a
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 5:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA-Librarian -SEL & RACF
Klein, Kevin wrote:
>//LIB1 EXEC PGM=AFOLIBR,'
>// PARM=''NJTA,NRJS'
>
>
[snip]
Does the above JCL look reasonable?? Aren't there
Klein, Kevin wrote:
//LIB1 EXEC PGM=AFOLIBR,'
// PARM=''NJTA,NRJS'
[snip]
Does the above JCL look reasonable?? Aren't there a few too many
apostrophes? I admit I haven't tried it.
--
-
| Edward E. Jaffe
Grimes
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA-Librarian -SEL & RACF
David writes...
-OPT GPO
-OPT EXEC,LIST,NOPC
-SEL NAME=//
Hmmm, interesting! I tried this a couple of different ways.
It seems to only build the necessary -SEL control state
David writes...
-OPT GPO
-OPT EXEC,LIST,NOPC
-SEL NAME=//
Hmmm, interesting! I tried this a couple of different ways.
It seems to only build the necessary -SEL control statements and pass them
to its OSJOB "jobstream" file. So, I'm presuming the next Lib step that
tries to use them wil
Ah, here we go. I THINK this will do it. Extracted from a PDS member
unreferenced in more than a decade. Packrat.
//APSP010 EXEC PGM=LIBRARN,
//PARM='NJTA,NRJS'
//MASTER DD DISP=SHR,DSN=
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//INDEXDD SYSOUT=*
//LIST DD SYSOUT=*
//OSJOBDD DSN=&OSJ
-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CA-Librarian -SEL & RACF
Hey there, z/OS 1.4, CA Libr VERSION - 4.2 GENLVL=0101 here.
I am RingTFM but to no avail yet. And this probably isn't the appropriate
forum, but there are lots of smart folks here.
It seems like I should be able, in a batch job
It does not update the member but on a disk master I think it updates the
referenced date even with TEMP (dusty, moldy bits from early 80s hard to
remember, rmembr, remem. re .. ).
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / a
Yep, I was thrown off by the following from the security manual under READ
access:
Such operations include selection for
temporary update and selection without update.
However, I misunderstood the context. Another section that didn't list
-SEL concluded with:
All other a
nal Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
>Of Steve Grimes
>Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 1:32 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>Subject: CA-Librarian -SEL & RACF
>
>Hey there, z/OS 1.4, CA Libr VERSION - 4.2 GENLVL=0101 here.
>
Steve Grimes wrote:
Hey there, z/OS 1.4, CA Libr VERSION - 4.2 GENLVL=0101 here.
I am RingTFM but to no avail yet. And this probably isn't the appropriate
forum, but there are lots of smart folks here.
It seems like I should be able, in a batch job, to -SEL module,TEMP against
a CA-Librarian
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Grimes
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 12:32 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: CA-Librarian -SEL & RACF
>
>
> Hey there, z/OS 1.4, CA Libr
Hey there, z/OS 1.4, CA Libr VERSION - 4.2 GENLVL=0101 here.
I am RingTFM but to no avail yet. And this probably isn't the appropriate
forum, but there are lots of smart folks here.
It seems like I should be able, in a batch job, to -SEL module,TEMP against
a CA-Librarian Master-File with READ
13 matches
Mail list logo
