--
Thanks to all who responded. Last question, I compared the PRODUCTION USER CAT against my TEST USER CAT and I noticed in the LISTCAT of the PRODUCTION verison it had the TEMP-EXP but it did not show in the LISTCAT of my TEST USER CAT. Should there be r
Thanks John.
"McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of willie bunter
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:23 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subj
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of willie bunter
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:23 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: CATALOG QUESTION - CISIZE
>
>
> Thanks to all who r
Thanks to all who responded. Last question, I compared the PRODUCTION USER CAT
against my TEST USER CAT and I noticed in the LISTCAT of the PRODUCTION verison
it had the TEMP-EXP but it did not show in the LISTCAT of my TEST USER CAT.
Should there be reason for concern?
David Andrews <[EMAIL
>I have to reorg some USER CATS because they contain the IMBED parm.
You shouldn't have to for z/OS 1.8, nor should you put it on your critical path
for implemementation.
Yes, support for IMBED is going away, but existing datasets don't fail, under
any release of z/OS, yet (unless I've missed an
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 06:45 -0800, willie bunter wrote:
> We will be implementing Z/OS 1.8 soon. I have to reorg some USER CATS
Oh, and lest I forget: you may want to disable autotuning, which has had
problems in z/OS 1.8. (Has IBM fixed this yet? I haven't been paying
attention.)
--
David An
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 06:45 -0800, willie bunter wrote:
> My question is should I need to code the CISIZE parm (CISIZE 28672
> which is being used in the current USER CAT) or is the system default
> of 4096 sufficient?
At the Tampa SHARE, Eileen McClintock gave a "Tuning Techniques for
Catalogs"
7 matches
Mail list logo
