Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 6:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CEEOPTS DD error message - when I'm not even using it!
Rex,
I would check with CA. The messages appear to be an annoyance but not a
problem.
A quick look through their knowledge base turned up s
ginal Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CEEOPTS DD error message - when I'm not even using it!
SYS1.PARMLIB(CEEPRMxx). The LE opts were (
2010 6:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CEEOPTS DD error message - when I'm not even using it!
Rex,
I would check with CA. The messages appear to be an annoyance but not a
problem.
A quick look through their knowledge base turned up several hits for
IDMS.
Once such hit was:
SYS1.PARMLIB(CEEPRMxx). The LE opts were (optionally) moved from an
assembled load module to SYS1.PARMLIB
Circa z/OS 1.7. Check Init & Tuning for full details.
HTH,
09:05 IDMS DC128010 V5 T43 CEE3792I The following messages pertain to
the DD: CEEOPTS dataset run-time options.
Rex,
I would check with CA. The messages appear to be an annoyance but not a
problem.
A quick look through their knowledge base turned up several hits for IDMS.
Once such hit was:
Title: MESSAGES CEE3792I AND CEE3790I WRITTEN TO LOG
Description:
NOTE: The lowest maintenance level to which thi
Hi List,
We're testing an OS upgrade from 1.7 to 1.10. We are running IDMS and
when the DBA or developers try to run some of their programs in the main
database address space, they are getting language environment errors.
The errors are not showing up in the z/OS log or job output from the
databa
6 matches
Mail list logo
