Re: CF pricing [was: SPFEDIT does a RESERVE!?!]

2008-04-10 Thread Tom Marchant
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:27:36 -0500, McKown, John wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Andrews >> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:03 PM >> >> Sigh. That CF is 1/4 of a z10 chip, already delivered to you and >>

Re: CF pricing [was: SPFEDIT does a RESERVE!?!]

2008-04-10 Thread Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
M > > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > > Subject: CF pricing [was: SPFEDIT does a RESERVE!?!] > > > > > > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 14:02 -0500, McKown, John wrote: > > > No coupling facility, so basic sysplex. XCF signalling via > > a ESCON CTC. > >

Re: CF pricing [was: SPFEDIT does a RESERVE!?!]

2008-04-09 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>CFL It's not called a CFL, either. It's called an ICF (Internal Coupling Facility) - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with t

Re: CF pricing [was: SPFEDIT does a RESERVE!?!]

2008-04-09 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Andrews > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:03 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: CF pricing [was: SPFEDIT does a RESERVE!?!] > > > On Wed, 2008-0

CF pricing [was: SPFEDIT does a RESERVE!?!]

2008-04-09 Thread David Andrews
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 14:02 -0500, McKown, John wrote: > No coupling facility, so basic sysplex. XCF signalling via a ESCON CTC. > That's all I have. The CF was nixed due to cost. Sigh. That CF is 1/4 of a z10 chip, already delivered to you and sitting idle. It could have been positioned and mar