Capturing LOAD/DELETE SVCs for a Certain Program

2008-12-10 Thread Adam Johanson
I know that there are LOAD/DELETE macros for a certain load module coming from another load module. I am trying to capture these events. What I had in mind was starting a GTF trace for SVCs 8 and 9 and setting a SLIP trap that specified as its DATA parameter (0R?,EQ,[module name]) and its RANGE

Re: Capturing LOAD/DELETE SVCs for a Certain Program

2008-12-10 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:35:12 -0600 Adam Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :>I know that there are LOAD/DELETE macros for a certain load module :>coming from another load module. I am trying to capture these events. What I :>had in mind was starting a GTF trace for SVCs 8 and 9 and setting a SL

Re: Capturing LOAD/DELETE SVCs for a Certain Program

2008-12-10 Thread John McKown
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:35:12 -0600, Adam Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I know that there are LOAD/DELETE macros for a certain load module >coming from another load module. I am trying to capture these events. What I >had in mind was starting a GTF trace for SVCs 8 and 9 and setting a SLIP t

Re: Capturing LOAD/DELETE SVCs for a Certain Program

2008-12-10 Thread Martin Kline
> However, the GTF trace is capturing all SVC 8 and 9 events for the address space. > What am I doing wrong? Can I not use a combination of GTF and SLIP to specify my criteria??? Your GTF options are telling GTF to collect all SVC 8/9 for the job as well as all slip records. --

Re: Capturing LOAD/DELETE SVCs for a Certain Program

2008-12-15 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In , on 12/10/2008 at 10:35 AM, Adam Johanson said: > However, the GTF trace is capturing all SVC 8 and 9 events for the >address space. Because you asked it to. SLIP records and SVC records are independent of each other. > What am I doing wrong? Asking for an SVC trace when it's not w