Re: COBOL Java Ldap and between

2008-03-05 Thread Tom Ross
Rob Schramm asks: I haven't looked this up... but is the license for the IBM Metal C mor= e attractive to the customers that may have balked at the IBM C/C++ compiler? Since the topic is COBOL calling COBOL to invoke a Java method, C and C++ are not needed and are irrelevant to the question. It

Metal C Question (was COBOL Java Ldap and between)

2008-03-05 Thread Rob Schramm
Ok Tom, then let me rephrase as a topic drift. Does anyone know if the license for the IBM Metal C is more attractive to the customers that may have balked at the IBM C/C++ compiler? -Rob Schramm -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /

Re: Metal C Question (was COBOL Java Ldap and between)

2008-03-05 Thread Edward Jaffe
Rob Schramm wrote: Does anyone know if the license for the IBM Metal C is more attractive to the customers that may have balked at the IBM C/C++ compiler? AFAIK, METAL is an option not a compiler. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los

Re: Metal C Question (was COBOL Java Ldap and between)

2008-03-05 Thread Bob Shannon
AFAIK, METAL is an option not a compiler That is correct. Bob Shannon Rocket Software -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO

Re: Metal C Question (was COBOL Java Ldap and between)

2008-03-05 Thread Rob Schramm
Huh.. well.. I guess I am off to the manual/announcements. I was under the impression that it was separately ordered... not just a part of the existing C/C++ offering. I must have been engaging in wishful thinking. -Rob Schramm Sirius Computer Solutions AFAIK, METAL is an option not a

Re: Cobol Java Ldap and between

2008-03-03 Thread Rob Schramm
Tim, I haven't looked this up... but is the license for the IBM Metal C more attractive to the customers that may have balked at the IBM C/C++ compiler? -Rob Schramm And to answer the other half of Magen Nargalit's question: If a c/c++ connector s required and I don't have c/c++ compiler for

Re: Cobol Java Ldap and between

2008-03-03 Thread Timothy Sipples
Rob Schramm asks: I haven't looked this up... but is the license for the IBM Metal C more attractive to the customers that may have balked at the IBM C/C++ compiler? Metal C is both a new compiler option and a runtime library found in the base z/OS. You still have to license the IBM C/C++

Re: Cobol Java Ldap and between

2008-03-02 Thread Timothy Sipples
And to answer the other half of Magen Nargalit's question: If a c/c++ connector s required and I don't have c/c++ compiler for z/os can I compile on another platform and port the object / Module to z/os environment? Yes, of course. You do not need the IBM C/C++ compiler installed in your

Cobol Java Ldap and between

2008-03-01 Thread Magen Nargalit
Hi, Does any body knows if there was any enhancment if the way standard structured cobol can call a java program? Do you still need to ceate a c/c++ connector ? I saw that oo cobol can call directly to java, can a structured cobol call to an oo cobol which calls java? I want to query z/os

Fw: Cobol Java Ldap and between

2008-03-01 Thread Bill Klein
I could be mistaken on this, but I don't think there is any requirement for a C/C++ connector for a non-OO COBOL program to INVOKE (not CALL) an OO COBOL program. I eally do NOT know this part of Enterprise COBOL, but you can check out: