In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/03/2007
at 10:35 AM, "Patrick O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Once again, the character seen in your post depends on the
>codepage used to display it.
His messages include
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
If you're using a MIME-c
ferent code points in different
code pages. It's at X'5A' in CP037/CP1140, CP1047 (and more) but is at
X'4F' in CP500/CP1148 and CP273/CP1141.
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
desets.
You can find the most common code pages at
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/globalization/cp/cp_cpgid.jsp
The PDFs contained therein are copies of the Official Versions maintained by
the IBM Globalization Centre of Competency for use by all IBM hardware and
software.
> I've
>
Joel C. Ewing wrote:
[snip it all]
Joel,
Here's a few links I've found helpful:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/software/globalization/codepages.html
http://www.tachyonsoft.com/cpindex.htm
http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/fonts.html
http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/index.html
http:
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 11:07:06 -0600, Joel C. Ewing
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
..
I notice your table doesn't mention the "¬" encoding differences
between
IBM-1140 and IBM-1047, but perhaps that character wasn't relevant
in the
context of that discussion.
...
Once ag
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 11:07:06 -0600, Joel C. Ewing
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>..
>I notice your table doesn't mention the "¬" encoding differences
between
>IBM-1140 and IBM-1047, but perhaps that character wasn't relevant
in the
>context of that discussion.
>...
Once again, the character seen i
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/14/2006
at 01:17 PM, Tony Harminc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>All these CECPs, btw, are restricted to 190 displayable characters,
>for compatibility with the 3270 architecture.
You're overlooking GE sequences.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/14/2006
at 07:45 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
>> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:41:43 -0300
>>
>> Whcih square brackets issue? There's more than one.
>>
>That's mostly the issue.
So how do y
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> It is my understanding that 1047 was created in response to a
> user Requirement to be congruent to 8859-1.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by congruent, but 1047, 037, 500, and many
of those other Country Extended Code Pages (CECPs) used in France, the UK,
G
In a recent note, David Cole said:
> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:41:17 -0400
>
>- Third, most character sets are not congruent (although [as Tony
> Harminc points out] 1047 and 8859-1 might be, I haven't yet had time
> to examine them thoroughly). Generally, each set will have character
com/cpindex.htm
with lots of code pages for translation.
Thank You Alex! And thanks to you as well, Dave Bond. This link is a
thorough description of a very large number of code pages, completely
cross referenced my individual characters. It is a wonderful
resource, and I want to thank Dave Bond
CP852 for MS-DOS based systems and printers
Mazovia for some MS-DOS based systems and printers
CP1250 for MS Windows systems
ISO8859-2 for Unixes and Internet application (i.e. HTML, mailing).
CP870 (EBCDIC) for mainframe
sometimes CP1047 for C programming on mainframe.
We use *all* of the codepa
In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:41:43 -0300
>
> Whcih square brackets issue? There's more than one.
>
That's mostly the issue.
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/13/2006
at 01:45 PM, Kirk Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>"88591" - ISO-8859-1
Obsolete; there's a new series of 8859 Latin-x character sets to
incorporate the Euro. As I recall, the replacement for Latin-1
(8859-1) is 8859-15.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/13/2006
at 01:38 PM, David Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Complete reversibility doesn't matter.
To you. But if you're asking for what others prefer, then you have to
accept what matters to them as part of their answer.
>But both th
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/13/2006
at 12:02 PM, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Many people here (including me) use 1047 (Latin-1/Open Systems) on
>the mainframe. This addresses the "square brackets" issues.
Whcih square brackets issue? There's more than one.
--
Shmuel (Sey
converted from 1146.
Mike Flint,
Systems Consultant,
Experian.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of David Cole
Sent: 13 June 2006 18:39
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: What's your favorite ASCII and EBCDIC code pages?
Hi,
Trying to
David Cole wrote:
> Complete reversibility doesn't matter. I need to reverse
> translate only those characters mutually defined to both code
> pages. Everything else can just go to ... well ... nulls,
> periods, blanks, whatever.
Not having reversible tables is almost always
Kirk wrote:
>We'll have to wait for the votes to know the results, but
>in the meantime you might want to look at Cp1047 (aka IBM-1047; Latin
>Ebcdic US) for
>taming those nasty brackets and braces :-)
>>I tried 1047 first and ran into some problems, although they escape me
at this point (wi
David Cole wrote:
So, what are your favorite code pages? Or is that too restrictive a
question. Should I be asking, what are your favorite translations?
Many people here (including me) use 1047 (Latin-1/Open Systems) on the
mainframe. This addresses the "square brackets" issues.
-
Kirk wrote:
>We'll have to wait for the votes to know the results, but
>in the meantime you might want to look at Cp1047 (aka IBM-1047; Latin
>Ebcdic US) for
>taming those nasty brackets and braces :-)
I tried 1047 first and ran into some problems, although they escape me at
this point (will
I've set up a call-in line where you can vote for your favorite codepage
from your cell phone.
Just "text" the number 1-900-QCODEPG with your vote:
"88591" - ISO-8859-1
"1252" - Cp1252
"1047" - Cp1047
"037" - Cp037
"8838" - UTF-8
...etc
We'll have to wait for the votes to know t
I'm not sure that your problem formulation is entirely adequate.
You make the point that you have little interest in diacritically marked
vowels, because you're a [monoglot] American; but you want to have '?' and
'¿' available, and the chief use of the second of this pair is in Spanish
text, w
David Cole wrote:
>Trying to come up with a "decent" (whatever that means) EBCDIC to
>ASCII translation is a bit like trying to decide the length of the
>coastline of Maine. It's all a matter of opinion.
>So... I am asking your opinions ...
I ran into some conversion annoyances when I sent da
te the mutually
defined characters of the 037 code page (one of the EBCDIC code
pages) into the corresponding characters of the 437 code page
("MS-DOS ASCII"). But both those code pages include a lot alphabetics
with various diacritical marks, and being an American, I don't need
25 matches
Mail list logo
