Good Morning Gentle Readers,
I am trying to solve the following puzzle. Some batch jobs which execute are
being directed to a VSM. However they abend when the default vol count limit
of 5 have been reached - s837-08. I added a vol count of 20 in the default
DATACLAS VIRT however for some
The big question is are your tapes SMS managed?
If so, is the dataclas being applied to this tape?
Otherwise, check your settings for dynamic volume count.
I believe that all will be OK if you code the vol count in JCL (last resort).
HTH,
snip
I am trying to solve the following puzzle.
From everything I know about SMS, data class can't be specified for non-SMS
files. The volume count can be placed on the DD card // VOL=(,,,22).
Hope this helps.
*
*
*George Rodriguez*
*Specialist II - IT Solutions*
*Application Support / Quality Assurance*
*PX - 47652*
*(561) 357-7652 (office)*
: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 11:40:36 AM
Subject: Re: DATACLASS NOT BEING RESPECTED
The big question is are your tapes SMS managed?
If so, is the dataclas being applied to this tape?
Otherwise, check your settings for dynamic volume count.
I believe that all will be OK if you code the vol count in JCL
DATACLAS can be assigned to non-SMS managed data sets, but dynamic volume count
is only applicable to SMS-managed data sets (according to the HELP panel).
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of George Rodriguez
Sent:
.
From: George Rodriguez george.rodrig...@palmbeachschools.org
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 11:47:01 AM
Subject: Re: DATACLASS NOT BEING RESPECTED
From everything I know about SMS, data class can't be specified for non-SMS
files. The volume count can be placed
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DATACLASS NOT BEING RESPECTED
Allan,
I verified, the tapes are not SMS managed. You recommended that I check your
settings for dynamic volume count. Would you know what the member in the
PARMLIB would be?
From: Staller, Allan allan.stal
alan_st...@calpers.ca.gov
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 12:18:48 PM
Subject: Re: DATACLASS NOT BEING RESPECTED
Good morning Esmee,
I don't believe that either volume count or dynamic volume count will
affect non-SMS-managed datasets.
Snippets from the dfp Storage
This is an SMS setting, and can be changed via the df/SMS panels.
Since your tapes are *NOT* SMS managed, the changing any of the data class
settings will have no effect.
snip
I verified, the tapes are not SMS managed. You recommended that I check your
settings for dynamic volume count. Would
Yes, that was my thought too: DATACLASS is also applied to non-SMS
datasets, but is it also applied to non-SMS managed tapes? That might
explain why it is not working.
Kees.
Greg Shirey wgshi...@benekeith.com wrote in message
news:f5ff22ced304764eaac97a43706235b74f3116b...@corpexmbx.bekco.com...
According to DFSMS Stor. Admin. Ref. For non-SMS-managed DASD data sets, the
system uses the allocation attribute values of the data class, but it does not
save the data class name. For tape data sets, only the expiration and retention
values are applied. See Chapter 7. Defining Data
11 matches
Mail list logo