DDCONS

2005-05-31 Thread Mendelson, Eric
What is the ramifications of ddcons in SMF. We have used the default of YES. How many shops have set ddcons to no TIA Project Leader - MVS HIP 32 Old Slip New York N.Y. 10005 212-806-4054 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Re: DDCONS

2005-05-31 Thread Greg Shirey
31, 2005 2:30 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: DDCONS What is the ramifications of ddcons in SMF. We have used the default of YES. How many shops have set ddcons to no -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: DDCONS

2005-05-31 Thread Natarajan Mohan
I have DDCONS set to NO. This helps in shutting down DFHSM faster. Thanks Natarajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/31/2005 12:29:49 PM What is the ramifications of ddcons in SMF. We have used the default of YES. How many shops have set ddcons to no TIA Project Leader - MVS HIP 32 Old Slip New

Re: DDCONS

2005-05-31 Thread Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc
We use DDCONS(NO). Helps to shutdown DB2 faster which we do only during IPL (aprox. 5 times a year) and maintenance (aprox. 3 times a year) For our SAP-DB2 sub-system it's a pain using DDCONS(YES) Roland -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: DDCONS

2005-05-31 Thread Norman Hollander
Just understand that with DDCONS(NO), you will generate more SMF records for each Task/Job. This could cause more back-end processing for MXG or MICS or your archival process. But this is probably preferred. I've been recommending NO since it first became available. I'd rather the backend take