What is the ramifications of ddcons in SMF. We have used the default of
YES. How many shops have set ddcons to no
TIA
Project Leader - MVS HIP
32 Old Slip
New York N.Y. 10005
212-806-4054
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
31, 2005 2:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DDCONS
What is the ramifications of ddcons in SMF. We have used the default of
YES. How many shops have set ddcons to no
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I have DDCONS set to NO. This helps in shutting down DFHSM faster.
Thanks
Natarajan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/31/2005 12:29:49 PM
What is the ramifications of ddcons in SMF. We have used the default
of
YES. How many shops have set ddcons to no
TIA
Project Leader - MVS HIP
32 Old Slip
New
We use DDCONS(NO). Helps to shutdown DB2 faster which we do only during IPL
(aprox. 5 times a year) and maintenance (aprox. 3 times a year)
For our SAP-DB2 sub-system it's a pain using DDCONS(YES)
Roland
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
Just understand that with DDCONS(NO), you will generate more SMF records for
each Task/Job. This could cause more back-end processing for MXG or MICS or
your archival process. But this is probably preferred.
I've been recommending NO since it first became available. I'd rather the
backend take
5 matches
Mail list logo