On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:01:30 +0100, CAPRON Romain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>DEFINE CLUSTER (NAME(SYS1.VVDS.Vvolser) -
>NIXD VOL(volser) -
>TRK(45,1))
>
That seems to me to be kind of a strange way to allocate them.
The default allocation is TRK(5,5) That allows
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: RE : Does VVDS must be catalogued ?
But when you defined it with the following statement:
DEFINE CLUSTER (NAME(SYS1.VVDS.Vvolser) -
NIXD VOL(volser) -
TRK(45,1))
It is automatically catalogued
Système
MATMUT, France
-Message d'origine-
De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Richards.Bob
Envoyé : jeudi 1 mars 2007 14:05
À : IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Objet : Re: Does VVDS must be catalogued ?
Short answer - NO
And it does not have to be cata
Short answer - NO
And it does not have to be cataloged.
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of CAPRON Romain
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 8:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Does VVDS must be catalogued
Hello,
I'm wondering if the VVDS "MUST" be cataloged or not...
All of our VVDS have the following file naming convention :
SYS1.VVDS.Vvolser
And are definied as with this IDCAMS statement :
DEFINE CLUSTER (NAME(SYS1.VVDS.Vvolser) -
NIXD VOL(volser) -
5 matches
Mail list logo