<snip> >If that were possible I would have continued to investigate if SRBs >could be used in IMS transactions. Some of our IMS transactions do a >lot of scanning of in memory tables, which requires a lot of CPU. Since
>this pieces of code just do memory work, I thought that were candidates >for SRBs, since those code sections do not use any IMS services or SVCs. <snip> It seems to me that you could offload some of this tables scanning work mentioned in your post directly to DB2: Why not create global temporary tables, loading them with the contents of concern and doing the scanning with SQL? Arthur ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
