Hi ,
I am new to easytrive, i have modified a module and added a new date control
card , it is giving the message *A010 INVALID FILE REFERENCE - DATEPARM. Can
anyone pls help me know what is the issue over here?
JOB INPUT VENINPUT
GET DATEPARM - newly added to read the datecontrol file
IF
DATEPARM goes EOF on second VENINPUT record?
For a 1 record input, how about putting the GET DATEPARM in the START PROC?
JOB INPUT VENINPUT START START-PROC
START-PROC. PROC
GET DATEPARM
END-PROC
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I am new to
Perhaps the Easytrieve manuals can shed light on the error message or the
proper syntax for file reference. Failing that, a call to the vendor might
be in order.
- Don Imbriale
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I am new to easytrive, i have modified
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Easytrieve*A010 INVALID FILE REFERENCE -
Perhaps the Easytrieve manuals can shed light on the error message or the
proper syntax for file reference. Failing that, a call to the vendor might
be in order.
- Don Imbriale
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Ron Thomas ron5
Not really. I think we had to fiddle a bit to make DB2 DCLGENs work - some
had to be massaged a bit for EMU to accept them. But nothing serious
Andy R
-IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote: -
rom: Ron Wells rwe...@agfinance.com
was there any show stoppers??
John,
This was briefly discussed here earlier in March 2010 also. Look for the
thread entitled 'CA Easytrieve replacement'
Dana
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
in
the Easytrieve languages and use MU in that fashion. Or some of both.
Anyway, I wanted to point that out. Much more information here:
http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/migration/
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Resident Enterprise Architect
STG Value Creation Complex Deals Team
IBM Growth Markets (Based
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 8:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Easytrieve to COBOL - IBM Migration Utility of
z/OS - program 5697-N44
I typically
Of
McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 8:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Easytrieve to COBOL - IBM Migration Utility of z/OS - program
5697-N44
I typically think of a migration utility as a one-time
thing. And you can
use IBM Migration Utility in that fashion, if you wish
Has anybody used this to migrate off of Easytrieve Plus from CA?
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/migration/
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-691-6183 cell
Morgan Stanley has used this tool with much success. All of our Easytrieve
programs were converted to COBOL. The source looks something like the old
compiler PMAP ugh. But they do work.
Thanks;
Ray Baraniecki
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney
1 New York Plaza - 18th Floor
New York, NY 10004
John Lewis Partnership has been using it successfuly for years
Andy Robertson
from: McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
Has anybody used this to migrate off of Easytrieve Plus from CA?
**
This email is confidential
was there any show stoppers??
From: Andy Robertson andy_robert...@johnlewis.co.uk
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 09/22/2010 03:53 PM
Subject:Re: Easytrieve to COBOL - IBM Migration Utility of z/OS -
program 5697-N44
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN
W dniu 2010-03-12 17:25, Ron Hawkins pisze:
I'd say it's more like 50% based on shops I've visited over the years.
It's exactly 0% of the shops I've visited over the years.
(honestly, in one case I'm not sure)
A conslusion is a proverb: Mine and my brother-in-law's opinion does
not
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] CA Easytrieve replacement
W dniu 2010-03-12 17:25, Ron Hawkins pisze:
I'd say it's more like 50% based on shops I've visited over the years.
It's exactly 0% of the shops I've visited over the years.
(honestly, in one case I'm not sure)
A conslusion is a proverb
On 11 Mar 2010 10:37:24 -0800, sredst...@googlemail.com (simone
redstock) wrote:
Most mainframe shops own File/AID. This has both an online and batch element
to it. File/AID batch is very powerful and we have replaced many of our
Easytrieve jobs with it. It performs better (less CPU) and is far
On 11 Mar 2010 14:44:31 -0800, wgshi...@benekeith.com (Greg Shirey)
wrote:
Most mainframe shops own File/AID??? I didn't know that, but I do know
mine does not.
Mine doesn't. Which could explain why I don't remember it having
Easytrieve type reporting capabilities, those could be new
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:11:11 -0600, Paul Peplinski
paul.peplin...@wpsic.com wrote:
There is one product (IBM Migration Utility) that claims to support EZT,
meaning it can convert EZT to COBOL on the fly and you can continue to
code
using EZT syntax if you wish.
IBM was reselling Foundation's
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 8:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA Easytrieve replacement
On 11 Mar 2010 14:44:31 -0800, wgshi...@benekeith.com (Greg Shirey
I am not very familiar with EasyTrieve (we have it). ICETOOL has some
nice reporting tools in it also. What would be really nice would be a way
to process a COBOL copybook to create ICETOOL symbols.
John McKown
COBDFSYM, from the Tools Tricks page
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:10:18 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
I am not very familiar with EasyTrieve (we have it). ICETOOL has some nice
reporting tools in it also. What would be really nice would be a way to process
a COBOL copybook to create ICETOOL symbols
I'd say it's more like 50% based on shops I've visited over the years.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Howard Brazee
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 6:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] CA Easytrieve
John McKown wrote on 03/12/2010 07:10:18 AM:
I am not very familiar with EasyTrieve (we have it). ICETOOL has
some nice reporting tools in it also. What would be really nice
would be a way to process a COBOL copybook to create ICETOOL symbols.
John,
See the Create DFSORT Symbols from COBOL
Most mainframe shops own File/AID. This has both an online and batch element
to it. File/AID batch is very powerful and we have replaced many of our
Easytrieve jobs with it. It performs better (less CPU) and is far easier to
maintain. even some of our junior team members are proficient in File/AID
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:26:44 +, simone redstock
sredst...@googlemail.com wrote:
Most mainframe shops own File/AID. This has both an online and batch element
to it. File/AID batch is very powerful and we have replaced many of our
Easytrieve jobs with it. It performs better (less CPU
i guess it depends why you are wanting to replace CA-Easytrieve
money?
functionality?
ease of use?
support?
at many shops at which I have pretented to work, I have used a product
once called QUIKJOB - now called Advantageā¼§ VISION:Report
yes it is another CA product - but it is the most
Most mainframe shops own File/AID??? I didn't know that, but I do know
mine does not.
As much as our Compuware reps (who I like and respect) would like to
have us replace Easytrieve with File/Aid, the programmers here who have
worked with both report that it is *not* a no-brainer, for many
Call CA Support. They will be able to help on that.
You could also check support.ca.com in product
documentation section.
znor...@ca.com
-Original Message-
From: Ron Thomas [mailto:ron5...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 09:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Easytrieve
Hello.
I was asked to set up a FAQ's for easytrieve tool for our organization, can any
one in the list have a one to share ?
Regards
Ron
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ron Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Easytrieve..
Hello.
I was asked to set up a FAQ's for easytrieve tool for our
organization, can any
one in the list have a one to share ?
Regards
Ron
John, the thing is that we are setting up some classroom training kind of
sessions for the easytrieve and would like to give the partcipants quiz
questions regarding the easytrieve training, so if any one has got similar kind
of things and if they can share it would help in the training
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ron Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Easytrieve..
John, the thing is that we are setting up some classroom
training kind
If anyone has replaced CA-Easytrieve at their shop and is willing to
share details about what product was chosen and how the replacement
performs in comparison to Easytrieve, I'd be very interested in hearing
about it.
Please contact me off-line.
TIA,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
wgshi
There is/was an IBM tool, which was suppose to replace Easytrieve. The IBM
product basically converts to the Easytrieve to Cobol, but without regards to
performance or maintainability. Our experience was not a good one.
Jerry Edgington
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
you recall the product ibm had??
From:
Edgington, Gerald gerald.edging...@libertymutual.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
02/16/2010 10:36 AM
Subject:
Re: CA Easytrieve replacement
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
There is/was an IBM tool, which was suppose
IBM resell (under OEM) PengiEzt the foundation Software. The product has two
modes of operation: One time conversion, and a translate, compile link-edit.
Both modes drops EasyTrieve. Cobol shoudl run faster even if EasyTrieve
running compiled. That's because IO is handled better with Cobol. From
If anyone has replaced CA-Easytrieve at their shop and is willing to share
details about what product was chosen and how the replacement performs in
comparison to Easytrieve, I'd be very interested in hearing about it.
I did it once, many aeons ago.
CA didn't own EZTREV, then.
We replaced
16, 2010 10:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA Easytrieve replacement
you recall the product ibm had??
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
big, act bold, start simple, grow fast...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Greg Shirey
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CA Easytrieve replacement
If anyone has replaced CA-Easytrieve
I believe there should be careful consideration when replacing products. Basic
cost is one, but there are others.
Are you looking for something that can read Easytrieve and not require a
conversion?
Are you going to provide training to those that are currently using Easytrieve
but will need
From: Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 11:24:36 AM
Subject: Re: CA Easytrieve replacement
IBM resell (under OEM) PengiEzt the foundation Software. The product has two
modes of operation: One time conversion
.
That being said, I should also like to ask if anyone has replaced a product in
their shop with Easytrieve and is willing to share details, I would also
appreciate hearing from you.
Thanks in advance,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Co.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 13:08 -0500, Knutson, Sam wrote:
You might also join and post your question in the IBM ISVCOSTS forum. It
is a forum provided by IBM for candid discussion of vendor products and
excludes ISV representatives.
I'll add that ISVCOSTS isn't really a technical forum. (There
On 30 Oct 2006 13:40:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Zelden)
wrote:
What version? What processor (have you upgraded recently)?
We had some issues when we upgraded to z990 with older versions.
The same would also apply to z9.
I'll find out. EasyTrieve was upgraded a week before Z-OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EasyTrieve SOC4
On 30 Oct 2006 13:40:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Zelden)
wrote
On 31 Oct 2006 08:14:29 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown,
John) wrote:
I found something on CA's database saying adding PARM ABEXIT NO will
work, but I don't know how to do this. When the DBAs get back and
the EasyTrieve expert gets back, they might know.
Put the line:
PARM ABEXIT
On 30 Oct 2006 13:40:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Zelden)
wrote:
What version? What processor (have you upgraded recently)?
We had some issues when we upgraded to z990 with older versions.
The same would also apply to z9.
The OS is 1.7, the EasyTrieve is 6.4. Both are recent upgrades
We are testing a new z9 processor under EZT R64 v0311. z/OS 1.4. EZT was
taking a bunch of OC4's. Had to apply CA APAR QO72665. This resolved the
problem. Just moving to a new processor without changing software levels
caused the problem. Hope this helps.
I haven't figured out the significant difference between EasyTrieve
programs that complete successfully and those that fail.
Two of the failures appeared to fail after writing the last record -
which record did not show up in the (NEW,CATLG,CATLG) file.
One fails before the EasyTrieve starts
Attached fix for EZT if your interested. Some of our ran without OC4'S and
most blew up. r 64 v 0311.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
On 31 Oct 2006 10:31:04 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Attached fix for EZT if your interested. Some of our ran without OC4'S and
most blew up. r 64 v 0311.
I'm reading this from the newsgroup - without attachments. Where can
I get this fix?
the vendor
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EasyTrieve SOC4
On 31 Oct 2006 10:31:04 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you
@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: EasyTrieve SOC4
On 31 Oct 2006 10:31:04 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Attached fix for EZT if your interested. Some of our ran without OC4'S
and
most blew up. r 64 v 0311.
I'm reading this from the newsgroup - without attachments. Where can
I get this fix
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:27:18 -0700, Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An old EasyTrieve job aborted with an 0C4
snip
Any ideas?
What version? What processor (have you upgraded recently)?
We had some issues when we upgraded to z990 with older versions.
The same would also apply to z9
Howard,
We just upgraded to a z9 on Sunday and started getting 0C4s. We quickly
moved Easytrieve 6.4 0311
into production (had been running ain development) and no more 0C4s.
What level of EZT are you on? Have you checked with CA for mtce?
Alan
Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Subject: Re: CA Easytrieve on z9 box
John, you may need this one depending on your level of z/OS. In my
earlier post I said I am on 1.4. The description of the CA APAR is
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *0311* ABEND IN COMPILE AFTER OS UPGRADE
And it is for specific situations in the eztrieve
List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ayon, John
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 9:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA Easytrieve on z9 box
I had talked to CA about QO72665. They wrote back:
The Apar QO72665 fix can only be applied to Gen0303. There is no fix for
EZT+ 6.4
Is anyone running Easytrieve v6.4 Gen0202 on a z9 box (2094-604)? CA's
answer is go to the latest version, but we have time constraints.
John Ayon
z/OS Server Technology - Technology Specialist
Phone: (616) 791-3623
Mainframe cc:
Discussion List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
.EDU CA Easytrieve on z9 box
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CA Easytrieve on z9 box
Is anyone running Easytrieve v6.4 Gen0202 on a z9 box (2094-604)? CA's
answer is go to the latest version, but we have time constraints.
John Ayon
z/OS Server Technology - Technology
is
the one we worked with.
Lucy
Is anyone running Easytrieve v6.4 Gen0202 on a z9 box (2094-604)? CA's
answer is go to the latest version, but we have time constraints.
John Ayon
z/OS Server Technology - Technology Specialist
Has anyone ever managed to get an Easytrieve DLI/IMS program to issue a
DLI call using an SSA which specifies that it wants to use Secondary
Index? The SSA is correct, and so is the DBD/PSB, as it works perfectly in
COBOL.
Easytrieve expects you to list (ie: code in pgm) all of the Segments you
Hi all,
Please ignore this question. I think the problem lies elsewhere, and am
still busy trying to isolate it. Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
63 matches
Mail list logo
