Re: FTP PUT with Store Unique

2009-11-02 Thread Chris Mason
e must have and a way to handle it is >right there in the standard FTP functionality. But apparently, if you >want something done right, you have to DIY. > >Thanks, again guys. > > > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bam

Re: FTP PUT with Store Unique

2009-11-02 Thread P S
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Miller, Pat wrote: > It would appear that some of the application programmers whom I've been > admonishing to be more explicit than "A processing error has occurred" > have been advising the FTP developers in their considerable spare time > on how to handle error c

Re: FTP PUT with Store Unique

2009-11-02 Thread Miller, Pat
Subject: Re: FTP PUT with Store Unique Pat The best list for topics related to the Communications Server (CS) IP component is IBMTCP-L: For IBMTCP-L subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO IBMTCP-L - > The IP User'

Re: FTP PUT with Store Unique

2009-10-31 Thread Chris Mason
Pat The best list for topics related to the Communications Server (CS) IP component is IBMTCP-L: For IBMTCP-L subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO IBMTCP-L - > The IP User's Guide & Commands ... seems pretty straightfor

Re: FTP PUT with Store Unique

2009-10-30 Thread Bill Godfrey
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:43:51 -0500, Pat Miller wrote: > > >I'm trying to use the SUNIQUE subcommand of FTP to avoid overlaying >existing documents when I send report files to a directory on a Windows >server using a mainframe batch job. The server doesn't seem to like >anything I send it, usual

FTP PUT with Store Unique

2009-10-30 Thread Miller, Pat
I'm trying to use the SUNIQUE subcommand of FTP to avoid overlaying existing documents when I send report files to a directory on a Windows server using a mainframe batch job. The server doesn't seem to like anything I send it, usually telling me that I am sending an invalid number of parameter