Re: Future date & USS

2007-09-02 Thread Chris Mason
-- From: "arun kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 5:26 PM Subject: Future date & USS Hi Listers On our test LPAR, development and test team wanted us to set a future date to test a particualr scenario. We IPL-

Re: Future date & USS

2007-08-29 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:34:03 -0700, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The operator responded to the message as below, > > * IEA888A LOCAL DATE=2007.240,CLOCK=08.43.10 REPLY U, OR UTC/LOCAL TIME > IEE600I REPLY TO 00 IS;DATE=2008.001,CLOCK=08.45.00 > IEA888A UTC DATE=2007.240,CLOCK

Re: Future date & USS

2007-08-29 Thread Tom Marchant
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:34:03 -0700, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The operator responded to the message as below, > > * IEA888A LOCAL DATE=2007.240,CLOCK=08.43.10 REPLY U, OR UTC/LOCAL TIME > IEE600I REPLY TO 00 IS;DATE=2008.001,CLOCK=08.45.00 > IEA888A UTC DATE=2007.240,CLO

Re: Future date & USS

2007-08-29 Thread arun kumar
The operator responded to the message as below, * IEA888A LOCAL DATE=2007.240,CLOCK=08.43.10 REPLY U, OR UTC/LOCAL TIME IEE600I REPLY TO 00 IS;DATE=2008.001,CLOCK=08.45.00 IEA888A UTC DATE=2007.24

Re: Future Date & USS

2007-08-28 Thread Paul Gilmartin
(cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and MVS-OE: the thread seems to have hyperspaced.) In a recent note, Paul H Bohannon said: > > Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:03:44 -0500 > > Has anyone put in a Requirement through SHARE users group for an IBM > response. > Has anyone tried zapping CVTLSO? That sh

Re: Future date & USS

2007-08-28 Thread Tom Marchant
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:26:20 -0700, arun kumar wrote: >Hi Listers > On our test LPAR, development and test team wanted us to set a future date to test a particualr scenario. We IPL-ed the system with CLOCKxx as below, >OPERATOR PROMPT >ETRMODE NO >ETRZONE NO > and we were able to set to a f

Re: Future date & USS

2007-08-28 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:26:20 -0700, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi Listers > On our test LPAR, development and test team wanted us to set a future date to test a particualr scenario. We IPL-ed the system with CLOCKxx as below, >OPERATOR PROMPT >ETRMODE NO >ETRZONE NO > and we were

Re: Future date & USS

2007-08-28 Thread Ulrich Krueger
Tuesday, August 28, 2007 8:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Future date & USS Hi Listers On our test LPAR, development and test team wanted us to set a future date to test a particualr scenario. We IPL-ed the system with CLOCKxx as below, OPERATOR PROMPT ETRMODE NO ETRZONE NO

Future date & USS

2007-08-28 Thread arun kumar
Hi Listers On our test LPAR, development and test team wanted us to set a future date to test a particualr scenario. We IPL-ed the system with CLOCKxx as below, OPERATOR PROMPT ETRMODE NO ETRZONE NO and we were able to set to a future date without any problem from TSO. IKJ56650I TIME