--
From: "arun kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 5:26 PM
Subject: Future date & USS
Hi Listers
On our test LPAR, development and test team wanted us to set a future date
to test a particualr scenario. We IPL-
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:34:03 -0700, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The operator responded to the message as below,
>
> * IEA888A LOCAL DATE=2007.240,CLOCK=08.43.10 REPLY U, OR UTC/LOCAL TIME
> IEE600I REPLY TO 00 IS;DATE=2008.001,CLOCK=08.45.00
> IEA888A UTC DATE=2007.240,CLOCK
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:34:03 -0700, arun kumar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The operator responded to the message as below,
>
> * IEA888A LOCAL DATE=2007.240,CLOCK=08.43.10 REPLY U, OR
UTC/LOCAL TIME
> IEE600I REPLY TO 00 IS;DATE=2008.001,CLOCK=08.45.00
> IEA888A UTC DATE=2007.240,CLO
The operator responded to the message as below,
* IEA888A LOCAL DATE=2007.240,CLOCK=08.43.10 REPLY U, OR UTC/LOCAL TIME
IEE600I REPLY TO 00 IS;DATE=2008.001,CLOCK=08.45.00
IEA888A UTC DATE=2007.24
(cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and MVS-OE: the thread seems to have
hyperspaced.)
In a recent note, Paul H Bohannon said:
>
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:03:44 -0500
>
> Has anyone put in a Requirement through SHARE users group for an IBM
> response.
>
Has anyone tried zapping CVTLSO? That sh
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:26:20 -0700, arun kumar wrote:
>Hi Listers
> On our test LPAR, development and test team wanted us to set a future
date to test a particualr scenario. We IPL-ed the system with CLOCKxx as
below,
>OPERATOR PROMPT
>ETRMODE NO
>ETRZONE NO
> and we were able to set to a f
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:26:20 -0700, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Listers
> On our test LPAR, development and test team wanted us to set a future
date to test a particualr scenario. We IPL-ed the system with CLOCKxx as below,
>OPERATOR PROMPT
>ETRMODE NO
>ETRZONE NO
> and we were
Tuesday, August 28, 2007 8:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Future date & USS
Hi Listers
On our test LPAR, development and test team wanted us to set a future date
to test a particualr scenario. We IPL-ed the system with CLOCKxx as below,
OPERATOR PROMPT
ETRMODE NO
ETRZONE NO
Hi Listers
On our test LPAR, development and test team wanted us to set a future date
to test a particualr scenario. We IPL-ed the system with CLOCKxx as below,
OPERATOR PROMPT
ETRMODE NO
ETRZONE NO
and we were able to set to a future date without any problem from TSO.
IKJ56650I TIME
9 matches
Mail list logo