Ed Finnell wrote:
Define new development? Most small to medium businesses evolve current
working/paying applications to add form and function. It's a question of will this
work with our existing system(s). I've seen good and bad, overfunded and
underfunded, great success and dismal failures
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Anton Britz
>
> Wayne,
>
> Not sure what you are smoking but the last time I looked, z/OS had a
> switch in parmlib that says "31 bit mode or 64 bit mode.
Haven't looked at z/OS 1.6 or later, have you?
z/OS 1.5 al
In a message dated 6/1/2006 6:18:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
True. But, such paid product support extensions have absolutely no
bearing on new development.
>>
Define new development? Most small to medium businesses evolve current
working/paying applications
e LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Anton Britz
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 5:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: IMS at the Crossroads?
Wayne,
Not sure what you are
Ed Finnell wrote:
It is my understanding there are far-eastern companies paying IBM millions
per month for DB/2 1.3 support! Stuff happens. Mergers don't, staff gets
rerouted, education plans get sidetracked. Projects get dropped and then the new
stuff turns out to be the application from Vo
In a message dated 6/1/2006 4:53:27 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
will be completely desupported by z/OS. Why on earth would those
involved in a major DB2 rewrite, targeted for generally availability
*after* September 2004, waste time "dual pathing" all of their co
Anton Britz wrote:
Not sure what you are smoking but the last time I looked, z/OS had a
switch in parmlib that says "31 bit mode or 64 bit mode.
The last time you looked??! Dude, that must have been years ago! The
Bi-Modal Accommodation feature was applicable to z/OS 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4
only!
>Not sure what you are smoking but the last time I looked, z/OS had a switch
>in parmlib that says "31 bit mode or 64 bit mode.
First, could you stop with the ad hominem?
Second, that switch went away with 1.5 (1.6 at the latest).
You have no choice with supported OS but to run with 64-bit.
Wayne,
Not sure what you are smoking but the last time I looked, z/OS had a
switch in parmlib that says "31 bit mode or 64 bit mode.
You can run z/Os in any of the two modes and it works but some how DB2 V8 on
the z/OS platform did not have that capability. Not talking about My/Sql on
your
are LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Anton Britz
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 4:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: IMS at the Crossroads?
NO other DATABASE ven
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
IBM no longer supports 31-bit operating systems.
So, why should they insist on that for their sub-systems?
Exactly so! Every z/OS release since September 2004 requires
z/Architecture. And, a mere nine months from now, the ESA/390 platform
will be completely desupported b
NO other DATABASE vendor FORCES you to change your hardware box to get
additional "software" performance functionality for your SAP/PeopleSoft
systems, which is not performing because the SAP/PeopleSoft vendors decided
to use DB2.
Now, before you start swearing/shooting/spitting again, this is
--Original Message--
To: Anton Britz
Sent: Jun 1, 2006 17:33
Subject: Re: Fw: IMS at the Crossroads?
>Where in the World have you heard that a Software supplier forces you to run a
>64 but machine before you can "Upgrade". The concept of 64-bit machines is
basicly to allow you to move som
13 matches
Mail list logo
