Correction they were 3081K 32's, one of the other posts jolted my memory back
into focus. Sorry for the drift.
--- On Tue, 5/12/09, Patrick Falcone patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
From: Patrick Falcone patrick.falco...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: 308x Processors - was Mainframe articles
To:
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
patrick.falco...@verizon.net (Patrick Falcone) writes:
Correction they were 3081K 32's, one of the other posts jolted my
memory back into focus. Sorry for the drift.
re:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Anne Lynn Wheeler
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: 308x Processors - was Mainframe articles
SNIP
3033 and 3081 in 370 mode were 24bit
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com (Thompson, Steve) writes:
SNIP
3033 and 3081 in 370 mode were 24bit (16mbyte) addressing (real
virtual).
SNIPPAGE
Didn't the 30xx machines have 26 bit addressing (the 3033 mode) when
operating in S/370 mode? Starting with the 3033MP?
re:
3033 and 3081 in 370 mode were 24bit 16mbyte) addressing (real virtual).
We had 40M on our 3081 in 370 mode.
Virtual was 16, but the OS could use the extra 24M, not as efficiently as XA,
but it was used.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
5 matches
Mail list logo