This is starting to drive me mad..
I have two separate LPARs, each running HSM. I'm as convinced as I can be that
both ARCCMD00 decks are the same, certainly as regards to auto backup function
anyway.
Some months back I tried to do away with directing backups to (virtual) tape,
intending to d
I'm setting up HSM to backup to DASD instead of tape.
I can't figure out how best to set up the disks though; whether to have a
(increasingly?) large number of daily backup volumes like I did with the tape
volumes, or a small amount of daily backup volumes and a (increasingly?) large
number of
Hi all
Is it better to have a small number (eg, one per backup task) of daily backup
volumes and a large number of spill volumes, or the other way around?
TIA
Brian
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and s
Do you have the UNIT parm specified on your DEFINE DUMPCLASS?
Neal
Bri P wrote:
This is starting to drive me mad..
I have two separate LPARs, each running HSM. I'm as convinced as I can be that
both ARCCMD00 decks are the same, certainly as regards to auto backup function
anyway.
Some mont
at the top
of my ARCCMD00.
Both LPARs are the same in this regard though.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Neal Scheffler
Sent: 29 June 2009 14:09
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: HSM DASD backup volumes
Do yo
budget approval,
FDR/ABR.
Has anyone got any experience, opinions or solutions using HSM DASD backup
volumes, especially about any of the following:
- it takes much, much longer to run than using tape (around 3-4 hours instead
of 45-50 minutes), which surprises me as I thought it would be quicke
-5154
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bri P
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 7:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: HSM DASD Backup volumes
I'm setting up HSM to backup to DASD instead of tape.
I can't figure out how
Thanks Terry
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Traylor, Terry
Sent: 06 October 2008 21:14
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM DASD Backup volumes
We have a few small z/OS 1.9 images which have no tape access and use
HSM
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bri P
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 8:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: HSM DASD Backup volumes
Hi all
Is it better to have a small number (eg, one per backup task) of daily
backup volumes and a large number of spill volumes, or the other way
around
I don't think it matters much to HSM, but I have always tried to keep the
number of spill volumes very low, (if any at all). Sorry I can't provide
better information on this, and I think I should know this one, but I can't
find anything that says it's a bad thing to do, it just feels bad to me.
N
Brian
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brian Westerman
Sent: 22 November 2008 02:43
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: HSM DASD Backup volumes
I don't think it matters much to HSM, but I have always tried to keep the
number
))
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bri P
[pilgrim...@ntlworld.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Using HSM DASD backup volumes
Hi folks
I&#x
u] On Behalf Of
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: 16 April 2009 12:13
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Using HSM DASD backup volumes
What parameter did you use - Markfull or Reuse? If for some reason you feel you
need to use Markfull, then you need to recycle on a regular basis to a
_
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bri P
[pilgrim...@ntlworld.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Using HSM DASD backup volumes
Sorry Dave, I should have made clear that the Spill volumes are DASD volum
14 matches
Mail list logo
